Material Science, Material Selection Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting materials for a rocket fuel tank designed for space tourism, focusing on fracture toughness and energy-limited failure. The user has calculated material indices M1 and M2, aiming for values greater than 10 and 0.25, respectively, to ensure safety and performance. However, they encounter an issue where the CES materials selection program only returns polymers, failing to yield the required two composites and two polymers. There is uncertainty about whether the material indices are correct or if the program is malfunctioning. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the problem and the relationship between fracture toughness and the stress-strain curve.
mathwurkz
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with this homework. Please have a look at my work and see if it checks out.
ROCKET FUEL TANK
A company has asked you to help their business in space tourism. They have designed a rocket that will be powered by nitrous oxide (reacted with rubber), and you are to select materials for the fuel tank (pressure vessel).
a) Considering the flight will be at high altitude (the edge of space), suggest materials that will have a good fracture toughness low temperature. THe M1 index should consider brittle failure under a displacement-limited design. Find materials with M1 > 10.
b) To increase passenger safety and spacecraft performance, consider M2 a second material index for energy-limited failure under fracture at minimum mass. Hint: Recall that toughness is the integral of the stress-strain curve (energy), and find an index that will maximize fracture toughness.
M2 > 0.25 required.
We are given 4 formulas.
\sigma = \frac{S_f pR}{2t}, \epsilon= \frac{\sigma}{E}, K_{IC}= C\sigma _f \sqrt{\pi a}, U= \frac{1 \sigma}{2 E}
For part a), this is how I solved it.
\sigma = \frac{K_{IC}}{C \sqrt{\pi a)}}, divide both sides by E., we know, \frac{\sigma}{E} = \frac{\Delta l}{l}, so substituting gives me, \Delta l = \frac{l K_{IC}}{CE \sqrt{\pi a}}
all in all...
\Delta l = \left[ \frac{1}{C \sqrt{\pi a}}\right] \left[l\right]\left[ \frac{K_{IC}}{E}\right] so...
M_1 = \frac{K_{IC}}{E} to maximize the fracture toughness, under displacement-limited design.
b) U = \frac{1\sigma ^2}{2E} = \frac{1}{2E} \frac{K_{IC}^2}{C \sqrt{\pi a}}
so i get...
M_2 = \frac{K_{IC}^2}{E}
The problem is when I go to the CES materials selection program. The index I have for part a ends up dominating and gives me a small list of materials. The problem is the next part of the problem tells us that parts a and b should have made our selections come down to 2 composites and 2 polymers. But what I end up getting from the program are just polymers. All the composites are below the slope line on the materials selection chart. So at this point, I am thinking that I must have misinterpreted the question wrong, got a wrong material index, or maybe the program is all buggy. If anyone can check what I am doing or even can tell me if my indicies do yield 2 composites and 2 polymers i'd appreciate it. THanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't have CES available on this machine, but somehow for the 2nd index I would've used (intuitively before reading it completely) the integral of the stress-strain curve itself, but your question does state to go with fracture toughness on this as well (and if you've linear-elasticity going there would suggest even more so ... although fracture toughness will be maximized also if you just maximize the area under the stress-strain curve). So would've thought it reasonable to maximize fracture toughness and energy the structure can take without connecting the two.
Probably doesn't change anything but thought I'd mention if you want to try it as a criterion, but don't see anything 'wrong' in the way you've interpreted the question itself. Puzzling :confused:
 
Back
Top