Material Science- x-ray diffraction and metal densities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the density of a metal with a BCC crystal structure and an atomic weight of 92.91 using x-ray diffraction data. The angle of diffraction for the (211) planes is given as 41.148° with a wavelength of 0.14 nm. Key equations include the relationship between lattice parameter, atomic radius, and the density formula involving the number of atoms, atomic weight, and volume. The user is seeking guidance on determining the lattice parameter without having the atomic radius. The conversation emphasizes the need to convert angles to radians for accurate calculations.
maiad
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a metal with an BCC crystal structure and atomic weight 92.91. When monochromatic x-radiation having a wavelength of 0.14 nm is used, the angle of diffraction (2*theta) for the (211) set of planes in this metal occurs at 41.148 ° (first-order reflection).


Compute the density of this metal in g/cm^3


The sin function requires input in radians.


Use decimal notation, digits after decimal: 2

Homework Equations



a=4R/sqrt(3)

p=n*A/V*N

n*lamba=2d(hkl)sin(theta)

d(hkl)=a/sqrt(h^2 +k^2 + l^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



i basically broke down the equation into P=(2Asin(theta)) / ((a^2)(sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2))

but for the vaule of a... i don't have the radius to find the vaule of a soo any hints would be nice :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maiad said:
n*lamba=2d(hkl)sin(theta)

What is known, what is unknown?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top