Materials and Particle Trapping

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of various materials, such as felt and plastic sheeting, in blocking small particles, specifically focusing on particle sizes around 0.3 microns. Participants explore the implications of these materials in the context of acoustic panel construction and sound absorption.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a 0.3 micron particle will not pass through 3 mil plastic sheeting and may be caught by felt, especially if dampened.
  • Others argue that ordinary felt, made from sheep's wool with a diameter of about 20 microns, is unlikely to trap 0.3 micron particles effectively, proposing that it may only trap particles of 6 microns and greater.
  • Mass loaded vinyl is mentioned as a material that will not allow air or 0.3 micron particles to pass through.
  • One participant inquires about the use of 100% polyester satin for blocking particles, questioning its effectiveness compared to other materials.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the acoustic properties of plastic sheeting at certain frequencies, with suggestions that its thickness and surface characteristics can affect sound absorption.
  • Participants discuss the importance of using a combination of materials for effective sound absorption, referencing methods like using egg cartons for surface orientation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of felt and plastic sheeting in blocking small particles, with no consensus reached on the best material for the intended application. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal choice of materials for both particle trapping and sound absorption.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific conditions such as particle velocity and the medium (air), as well as the unresolved nature of how different materials interact acoustically at various frequencies.

icor1031
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Please excuse me if this isn't a physics question - I'm not sure where it belongs.

Felt, such as this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Felt-by-the-YARD-Craft-Supplies-36-INCHES-X-36-INCHES-square-100-polyester-/261301533508

And 3mil plastic sheeting, as this: http://www.homedepot.com/p/Husky-8-Ft-x-100-Ft-Clear-3-mil-Plastic-Sheeting-CF0308C/202184057

--------

How small of a particle size, will those block?
For example: if I throw a .3 micron particle at the felt, will it go through?
How about the plastic?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming your medium is air and the 0.3 um particle is traveling slowly, it will not pass through the 0.003” plastic film, it will probably get caught up for some time in the felt. You could increase the chance of a particle being caught by the felt if you dampen the felt with oil or water. The felt is behaving like a HEPA filter.
See; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEPA
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Appreciated, friend.
 
Note that felt is usually made from sheep's wool which has a diameter of about 20 um.
To reliably trap 0.3 um particles requires a fibre size closer to 1 um.
It is probable therefore that ordinary felt will only trap particles of 6 um and greater.
 
Baluncore said:
Note that felt is usually made from sheep's wool which has a diameter of about 20 um.
To reliably trap 0.3 um particles requires a fibre size closer to 1 um.
It is probable therefore that ordinary felt will only trap particles of 6 um and greater.

By chance, are you familiar with mass loaded vinyl? How would it do? :)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/2lb-Mass-Loaded-Vinyl-4-x-10-40-sf-MLV-/120775275480?pt=US_Acoustical_Treatments&hash=item1c1ec473d8
 
Mass loaded vinyl will not pass air, let alone 0.3 um particles.

What are you trying to accomplish here?
How much area of filter do you need?

You can buy rolls of HEPA filter material such as these.
http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/hepa-filter-cloth.html
You can search for your local supplier.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Baluncore said:
What are you trying to accomplish here?

It's for making acoustic panels. The MLV is for diaphragm resonators, and the felt/plastic are for porous absorbers.
I'm probably going to fill both with Mineral Wool, and I want to avoid fibrosis. ;)

I asked about felt, as a possible alternative to plastic. But that won't work, as you pointed out.

Thanks again!
 
Baluncore said:
Mass loaded vinyl will not pass air, let alone 0.3 um particles.

I'm back, again. :)

My plastic sheeting (seems to be .31mil, not 2mil) is causing issues @ 2.5kHz, even with 1 layer of felt on top of it.So, my question: How well will satin work to block particles? It says "100% polyester."
If that won't work well, is there a material that you would suggest?

Thanks!
 
I presume you are using the plastic film to stop glass dust escape.
What problems does plastic film cause at 2.5 kHz.

The thickness of plastic sheet will determine it's mass per unit area and resonance frequency.
It will behave differently if it has a crumpled surface or if it is bonded to the felt.

100% polyester satin is a woven polyester fibre, so it will probably not stop fine dust. You would need a bonded polymer film material such as is used to make car covers or disposable coveralls for contaminated sites. If it is waterproof it will probably stop fine dust.

Sound absorption comes from a sandwich of different materials with multi-faceted surface orientation. For example, used egg cartons glued to a surface can make a big difference.
 
  • #10
Baluncore said:
Sound absorption comes from a sandwich of different materials with multi-faceted surface orientation. For example, used egg cartons glued to a surface can make a big difference.

That is one method, but "flat" acoustic panels (often used as internal dividing walls in office buildings) basically work like a transmission line with impedance changes along its length, to let the energy get "inside" the panel and stop it getting out again.

The purpose of the filling material (rock wool etc) is to provide a huge surface area relative to the volume of the internal cavity, to absorb the kinetic energy (i.e. the sound) in the air into the viscous boundary layer in the air surrounding each individual fiber. Loudspeaker cabinets are filled with the same type of material for the same reason.
 
  • #11
Baluncore said:
What problems does plastic film cause at 2.5 kHz.

The SPL is high, similar to not using a panel. I'm not sure about decay time, or anything else.

It's okay, it goes away if I use *two* layers of felt. :)

Thanks again, be well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K