Materials Science or Applied Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparative value of two MSc programs—MSc Materials Science (online) and MSc Applied Physics (on-campus)—in terms of employability in science, research, or engineering. Key points include the online nature of the Materials Science course, which allows access to university facilities and completion of a project on campus, yet does not explicitly indicate its online format on the final certificate. In contrast, the Applied Physics program is traditional, featuring in-person lectures. Participants emphasize the need for more detailed information about the course content to make an informed decision, highlighting that the names alone do not provide sufficient context for evaluating their relevance to career opportunities. Additionally, there is a mention of the overlap between applied physics and materials science in some US programs, suggesting that the distinction may not be as clear-cut as it seems.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
Which MSc course below do you think would be better to have upon graduation, in terms of being able to obtain employment in some area of science or research, or perhaps engineering?

Both are at the same university.

MSc Materials Science. This is an online course (no lectures), though a student can use all the university facilities as per normal, and the project is done at the university. It will not state on the final certificate that it was an online course, though of course an employer could simply observe this from the university website.

MSc Applied Physics. This is an on-campus course with lectures.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZedCar said:
Which MSc course below do you think would be better to have upon graduation, in terms of being able to obtain employment in some area of science or research, or perhaps engineering?

Both are at the same university.

MSc Materials Science. This is an online course (no lectures), though a student can use all the university facilities as per normal, and the project is done at the university. It will not state on the final certificate that it was an online course, though of course an employer could simply observe this from the university website.

MSc Applied Physics. This is an on-campus course with lectures.

Unfortunately, you gave no relevant information on the content of each course for any of us to decide which is better. We cannot judge a field of study just based on the name, especially when they are roughly similar to one another, anymore than you can judge which is a better school bag for me based simply on the color.

In many programs here in the US, "applied physics" also includes material science/condensed matter physics (see: Stanford University).

Zz.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top