Algebra Math textbooks for physics grad student and other questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for strengthening mathematical skills, particularly in linear algebra, in preparation for a master's degree in theoretical physics. The individual has a foundational understanding of linear algebra concepts but seeks to deepen their knowledge beyond computational methods. Recommendations for further reading include Anton's textbook, along with Strang, Lang, and Axler, though budget constraints limit access to multiple texts. The importance of linear algebra in physics is emphasized, with suggestions for additional resources like Don Koks' "Explorations in Mathematical Physics," which connects linear algebra to physical concepts, and "Mathematics for Physicists" by Dennery and Krzywicki, as well as Hassani's work on mathematical foundations. The discussion highlights the necessity of a solid mathematical background for success in theoretical physics studies.
dsatkas
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
I hope this post won't become too tedious.
I've completed my undergrad studies in physics and if things go well i will begin my master's degree in April. The thing is, since my path to graduation has been peculiar (to say the least) I'm kinda weak in maths skills atm and need to improve. I'm going to apply for a master's degree in theoretical physics so it's safe to assume strengthening my math background is almost mandatory. As the title suggests i want to restudy linear algebra. Obviously i don't have to start from scratch, I'm familiar with matrices, determinants, eigenvalues etc. My LA course consisted of computational style of algebra, nothing fancy with mathematical proofs, but i suspect I'm going to need more than that. I have already started reading from Anton which covers basically what i was taught but what should i also read to deepen my understatement? I have read here that Strang, Lang, Axler are good choices but can't afford all of them money and time-wise. I should also point out that at the same time I'm trying to study group theory with applications in physics. What is the difference between Lang's Introduction to LA and LA? Sorry for all the questions. I want to ask more questions but those will come later. I would appreciate any help

ps. I should probably state that I'm not that brilliant of a student and kind of a slow learner
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check this thread. I found most of the PDF pretty easily
 
thank you for the reply but I'm not sure it's very relevant to what I'm asking. They are talking about analysis textbooks and stuff
 
Fair enough. Found it worth passing the link. Another one I would recommend to others is this one by Gerard 't Hooft, but in your case I have doubts (he doesn't mention LA -- to me a sure hint that perhaps what you carry in mental luggage in that area may be adequate already).

My LA isn't all that sophisticated, so I'm glad I will also get an alert when someone else has a good hint for us :smile:.
 
Anyone?
 
In many ways, linearity is the key to physics, so buckling down on the linear algebra sounds like a good idea. I started with Strang's book. After that, I studied the heck out of Don Koks' Explorations in Mathematical Physics. The first chapter "A Trip Down Linear Lane", really helped deepen my understanding of how linear algebra relates to physics. Since then, I've learned a lot from two other books. The first is Mathematics for Physicists by Dennery and Krzywicki. The other is Hassani's book on the foundations of mathematical physics. These last two are arguably not for the mathematically faint of heart.
 
  • Like
Likes dsatkas
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top