Mathematica Trouble: Solving for x in Sinc[x] > (1/1.01)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
If anyone on here uses Mathematica maybe you could help me with an issue I am having with computing the following:

Solving for x in: Sinc[x] > (1/1.01)

I am looking only at the positive values and not making any headway with the Solve or NSolve commands. I should also mention that this only makes sense for the angle being between 0 and Pi/2.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+sinc(x)+for+0+<+x+<+pi/2
shows there will be a single open interval where Sinc[x]>1/1.01 and 0<x<pi/2.

This
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+sinc(x)==1/1.01+and+x>0
gives you the upper endpoint.

When you know there is a single simple interval for a solution then I would suspect that Mathematica might correctly accept

NSolve[Sinc[x]==1/1.01,x]

to give you that upper endpoint, but unfortunately I cannot verify that for you at the moment.

Note: There is the Math & Science Software section of the forum where many of the small questions about Mathematica syntax might be more quickly and better answered. Poke around several sections below the Math category and you will find it.
 
In[1]:= FindRoot[Sinc[x]-1/1.01,{x,.25}]

Out[1]= {x->0.244097}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top