Mathematical Induction: Chapter 1, Example 4 from WiM? by Courant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical induction problem involving the product (1+q)(1+q^2)(1+q^4)...(1+q^(2n)). The user successfully establishes the base case but struggles with the inductive step, particularly in manipulating the expressions involving powers of q. They express confusion over the application of the law of indices and how to correctly handle the multiplication of terms. Other participants offer hints and encouragement, emphasizing the importance of reviewing previous work and applying mathematical laws correctly. The conversation highlights the challenges of learning mathematical induction and the collaborative effort to overcome them.
DarrenM
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
This is not homework, per se, but I have recently started reading Courant and Robbins' What is Mathematics?

Homework Statement


Prove by mathematical induction.
(1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2n) = (1-q2n+1) / (1-q)

Homework Equations


Only the problem itself.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the method the book briefly introduced, I first established that A1 was true.

A1 = (1+q)(1+q2) = 1+q+q2+q3

Furthermore,

(1-q21+1) / (1-q) = (1-q4) / (1-q) = (1-q2)(1+q2) / (1-q) = (1+q)(1+q2)

Next, I attempted to show that Ar+1 follows from Ar, but this is where I ran into trouble.

1. (1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2r) = (1-q2r+1) / (1-q)

2. (1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2r)(1+q2r+1) = {(1-q2r+1) / (1-q)}(1+q2r+1)

This is the point at which I hit a wall. I feel like it's something absurdly simple, but I've been stuck on this for hours; I think it's the variable raised to a power raised to a binomial power that is throwing me for a loop.

I tried simply multiplying (1-q2r+1) and (1+q2r+1); that gives me another binomial that is the difference of two squares:

{(1-(q2r+1)(q2r+1)} / (1-q)

But again, stumped. I believe that if I multiply those two terms together I get (1-q2r+1+2r+1) / (1-q). If that's the case, this is the point at which I have completely lost it. However, I am not confident that I'm doing that properly.

Just to see if I could work backwards, I took a look at what I think Ar+1 would look like:

Ar+1 = (1-q2r+2) / (1-q)

Any hints on where/what I'm doing wrong would be very much appreciated.

P.S. - All of this is very new to me, so I apologize if it's not quite as clear or as polished as it should be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DarrenM said:
2. (1+q)(1+q2)(1+q4) ... (1+q2r)(1+q2r+1) = {(1-q2r+1) / (1-q)}(1+q2r+1)

I don't understand your parenthesis.
well..
A_{r+1}=(1+q^{2^{r+1}})\frac{1-q^{2^{r+1}}}{1-q}
Just by focusing on the numerator,
(1+q^{2^{r+1}})(1-q^{2^{r+1}})
Gives us
1-q^{2^{r+1}\times2}I'll leave the rest to you.
Whenever you are stuck, check your previous workings , then try other approach to that question.
 
Sorry about the parenthesis and brackets, I'm not sure how to clearly represent fractions with the forum-code.

And I'm afraid that 1-q2r+1x2 takes me right back to where I was stuck. Any additional hint to nudge me in the right direction? :)
 
DarrenM said:
Sorry about the parenthesis and brackets, I'm not sure how to clearly represent fractions with the forum-code.

And I'm afraid that 1-q2r+1x2 takes me right back to where I was stuck. Any additional hint to nudge me in the right direction? :)

law of indices:

a^b \times a^c=a^{b+c}

Now:
2^{r+1} \times 2^{1} = ?
 
Last edited:
Aaaaargh.

It's not like I didn't just do that this morning on a previous problem. Nor is it like I wasn't staring at 1-q2(2r+1) while trying to solve this.

2r+1 x 21 = 2r+1+1 = 2r+2

Thanks very much for the help.
 
Welcome! Never ever abandon your law of indices agn (=
 
Back
Top