Mathematical model of pendulum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical modeling of an ideal pendulum, specifically focusing on the equations governing its motion and energy conservation. Participants are exploring the implications of the energy equation and its relationship to the motion described by the pendulum's differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the time derivative of the energy equation and relate it to the motion equations of the pendulum. There is confusion regarding the treatment of terms in the energy equation and how they relate to the original motion equations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the energy conservation equation and the motion of the pendulum. Some participants have offered insights into the derivatives involved, while others are questioning how these derivatives lead to the required energy condition. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. The original equations and assumptions about the pendulum's motion are central to the discussion.

limofunder
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

W
We know the model of an ideal pendulum at rest is given by
[tex]L \ddot{\theta} + g sin \theta =0, t\geq0[/tex]
[tex]\dot{\theta}(0)=0[/tex]
[tex]\theta(0)=\theta_0[/tex]
where [tex]\theta(t)[/tex] is the pendulum angle at time t, L is the length of the pendulum, and g is gravity.
Now, consider the total energy per unit mass of the pendulum given by
[tex]E(\theta,\dot{\theta}) = \frac{1}{2}L \dot{\theta}^2 - g cos \theta[/tex]
Show that this equation is constant along the previously given solutions (the first 3 equations initially given, let's call them EQ [1] ), [tex]\forall t\geq0[/tex]. Use this result to show that the solution of [1] should satisfy
[tex]\frac{1}{2}L\dot{\theta}^2-g cos \theta + g cos \theta_0 = 0, \forall t\geq0[/tex]
(lets call this EQN [2])

Homework Equations



we know that if E(theta, thetadot) is a constant, then
[tex]\frac{d E(\theta,\dot{\theta})}{dt} = 0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


so, taking the derivative of the energy, we have:

[tex]\frac{d E(\theta,\dot{\theta})}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}[\frac{1}{2} L \dot{\theta}^2 - g cos \theta][/tex]

[tex]= L \ddot{\theta} +\dot{\theta}g sin\theta[/tex]
however, this does not seem to equal [1], as [tex]\dot{\theta}gsin\theta[/tex] never appears in the solution. what am I doing wrong?
or do we not take the time derivative of the second term in the energy equation (the sin(theta) term), thus giving
[tex]\frac{d E(\theta,\dot{\theta})}{dt} =L \ddot{\theta} +g sin\theta[/tex] which is equal to zero by definition of [1], thus if the derivative of the energy equation is equal to zero, then by definition of constant, energy is constant!
now, i am in confusion as how to use this result to prove EQN [2]?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi limofunder! :smile:

(have a theta: θ :wink:)
limofunder said:
[tex]\frac{d E(\theta,\dot{\theta})}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}[\frac{1}{2} L \dot{\theta}^2 - g cos \theta][/tex]

[tex]= L \ddot{\theta} +\dot{\theta}g sin\theta[/tex]

hmm :rolleyes: … d/dt (Lθ') = Lθ''

but d/dt (Lθ'2) = … ? :smile:
 
limofunder said:
[tex]\frac{d E(\theta,\dot{\theta})}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}[\frac{1}{2} L \dot{\theta}^2 - g cos \theta][/tex]

[tex]= L \ddot{\theta} +\dot{\theta}g sin\theta[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{2} L \dot{\theta}^2\right)=L\dot{\theta}\ddot{\theta}[/tex]

:wink:

EDIT: Tinytim beat me to it
 
ok, so then that gives way to
dE/dt = θ' (Lθ''+g sinθ)
the second term being by definition of [1] >= 0 for all time.
Thank you,
so that still begs the question, I do not see how this forces
[1] to satisfy
1/2 Lθ' - g cosθ + g cosθ0
 
limofunder said:
ok, so then that gives way to
dE/dt = θ' (Lθ''+g sinθ)
the second term being by definition of [1] >= 0 for all time.
Thank you,
so that still begs the question, I do not see how this forces
[1] to satisfy
1/2 Lθ' - g cosθ + g cosθ0

Because E = constant is a solution, so just call the constant gcosθ0 :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K