Mathematical proof for positive feedback

AI Thread Summary
Positive feedback in operational amplifiers (op-amps) can lead to saturation, which is mathematically supported by the gain equation A = A0 / (1 + βA0). In this equation, a positive feedback factor (β) reduces the denominator, causing the gain to approach infinity as β nears 1. This results in the output voltage being driven to saturation, as even minor input changes yield significant output variations. The phenomenon demonstrates that with increasing feedback, the op-amp's gain decreases and can ultimately lead to saturation. Thus, the mathematical proof confirms that positive feedback drives op-amps into saturation.
anb2020
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Is there a mathematical proof that the positive feedback makes the op-amp saturated?

http://i.imgur.com/71PNh.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do you understand why it saturates (non-mathematical seat of the pants explanation)?
 
Let's clarify this by specifying positive DC feedback drives the opamp into saturation. Positive AC feedback makes it oscillate.
 
the_emi_guy said:
Do you understand why it saturates (non-mathematical seat of the pants explanation)?

Yes of course
 


There is indeed a mathematical proof that positive feedback can cause an operational amplifier (op-amp) to become saturated. This can be seen by analyzing the gain equation for an op-amp in a positive feedback configuration.

The gain equation for an op-amp in a closed loop configuration is given by A = A0 / (1 + βA0), where A0 is the open loop gain and β is the feedback factor. In a positive feedback configuration, the feedback factor is greater than 0, meaning that the denominator of the gain equation is less than 1.

When the feedback factor is small, the gain of the op-amp is approximately equal to the open loop gain A0. However, as the feedback factor increases, the gain decreases and eventually becomes 0 when the feedback factor is equal to 1. This means that the output voltage of the op-amp will be equal to the input voltage multiplied by the open loop gain A0, resulting in saturation.

Furthermore, the gain equation also shows that as the feedback factor approaches 1, the gain of the op-amp approaches infinity. This is known as the "infinite gain" phenomenon, where even a small change in the input voltage can cause a large change in the output voltage, leading to saturation.

In conclusion, the mathematical proof for positive feedback causing op-amp saturation lies in the gain equation, which shows that as the feedback factor increases, the gain decreases and eventually becomes 0, resulting in saturation.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top