Maths Question: Parag and Prajakta's Walking and Driving Speeds - Find the Ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter ritwik06
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Parag arrives at the Pimpri Railway station one hour early and walks towards home, meeting Prajakta, who picks him up in the car. They arrive home 10 minutes earlier than usual, leading to a calculation of the ratio of Parag's walking speed to Prajakta's driving speed. The discussion reveals that the car saves 5 minutes each way by not driving the distance Parag walked, which helps derive the speed ratio. The second question about the ratios a/(b+c) = b/(a+c) = c/(a+b) concludes that if each ratio equals -1, it results in a contradiction since a+b+c cannot be zero.
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
1. Parag arrives at Pimpri Railway station from office every day at 6:00 p.m.
where Prajakta picks him up in the car to take him home. One day he arrives
at Pimpri one hour early and starts walking towards home. On the way he
meets Prajakta and they return home together in the car. If they arrive the
home 10 minutes earlier then what is the ratio of Parag's walking speed to
Prajakta's driving speed?


Work done by me on this question:
Let distance from station to home= d metres
Driving speed=v1 m/s
Walking speed=v2 m/s
Time taken by car usually=d/v1
according question (if x is the distance traveled by walking),
d/v1={(d-x)/v2}+(x/v1)+600
On solving,
{(d-x)/v1}-{(d-x)/v2}=600
But I can't find the ratio??


2.If a/(b+c) = b/(a+c) = c/(a+b) and a+b+c is not 0 then find value of each
ratio.
Work done:
The answer given in my book is -1. But I don't think that a+b+c will not be
equal to zero in that case?




This is all I could do. Please don't give me answers like show me your work etc. If you know it tell me otherwise dont.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For question one: If he walked a distance of d before getting picked up, then the car coming to pick him up didn't need to drive that distance d. It would have taken (presumably), the same time for the car to drive both ways, so it would have taken 5 minutes for the car to go that distance, since they got home a total of 10 minutes earlier (five minutes for the car to drive each way d meters)
 
Office_Shredder said:
For question one: If he walked a distance of d before getting picked up, then the car coming to pick him up didn't need to drive that distance d. It would have taken (presumably), the same time for the car to drive both ways, so it would have taken 5 minutes for the car to go that distance, since they got home a total of 10 minutes earlier (five minutes for the car to drive each way d meters)

Thanx a lot. But please can you let me out while I myself am thinking about this. Please let me have a solution. Thnak you very very much!
 
Where does that "600" come from? Since he arrived at the station 1 hour= 60 minutes earlier than usual but arrived at home 10 minutes earlier, the "walking and driving" time is 60-10= 50 minutes longer than the "driving only" time. In your terms,
\frac{d}{v_1}+ 50= \frac{d-x}{v_1}+ \frac{x}{v_2}
\frac{d}{v_1}+ 50= \frac{d}{v_1}- \frax{x}{v_1}+ \frac{x}{v_2}
\frac{x}{v_1}+ 50= \frac{x}{v_2}
Multiply both sides by v_1 and divide by x:
\frac{v_2}{v_1}= 1+ \frac{50v_1}{x}

Now use Office Shredder's point: Since the car arrived at home 10 minutes earlier than normal, it must have saved 5 minutes each way by not having to go that distance x:
\frac{x}{v_1}= 5
so
\frac{50v_1}{x}= \frac{50}{5}= 10[/itex]<br /> <br /> <br /> As for the second question:<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> 2.If a/(b+c) = b/(a+c) = c/(a+b) and a+b+c is not 0 then find value of each<br /> ratio.<br /> Work done:<br /> The answer given in my book is -1. But I don&#039;t think that a+b+c will not be<br /> equal to zero in that case? </div> </div> </blockquote> You are exactly correct. If each of the ratio&#039;s is equal to -1, then, for example,<br /> \frac{a}{b+c}= -1<br /> so a= -b- c, a+ b+ c= 0. From<br /> \frac{a}{b+c}= \frac{c}{a+b}<br /> &quot;cross multiplying&quot; gives a^2+ ab= bc+ c^2<br /> and from <br /> \frac{a}{b+c}= \frac{b}{a+ c}<br /> we get a^2+ ac= b^2+ bc<br /> Subtracting ab- ac= c^2- b^2 or a(b-c)= (c-b)(c+b).<br /> <b>If b- c is not 0</b> we must have a= -(b+c) which would make each ratio -1, but that is exactly the &quot;forbidden&quot; case that a+ b+ c= 0. If b- c = 0, then, using the other equality, we get a= b= c, in which case each ratio is 1/2.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Where does that "600" come from? Since he arrived at the station 1 hour= 60 minutes earlier than usual but arrived at home 10 minutes earlier, the "walking and driving" time is 60-10= 50 minutes longer than the "driving only" time. In your terms,
\frac{d}{v_1}+ 50= \frac{d-x}{v_1}+ \frac{x}{v_2}
\frac{d}{v_1}+ 50= \frac{d}{v_1}- \frax{x}{v_1}+ \frac{x}{v_2}
\frac{x}{v_1}+ 50= \frac{x}{v_2}
Multiply both sides by v_1 and divide by x:
\frac{v_2}{v_1}= 1+ \frac{50v_1}{x}

Now use Office Shredder's point: Since the car arrived at home 10 minutes earlier than normal, it must have saved 5 minutes each way by not having to go that distance x:
\frac{x}{v_1}= 5
so
\frac{50v_1}{x}= \frac{50}{5}= 10[/itex]<br /> <br /> <br /> As for the second question:<br /> <br /> You are exactly correct. If each of the ratio&#039;s is equal to -1, then, for example,<br /> \frac{a}{b+c}= -1<br /> so a= -b- c, a+ b+ c= 0. From<br /> \frac{a}{b+c}= \frac{c}{a+b}<br /> &quot;cross multiplying&quot; gives a^2+ ab= bc+ c^2<br /> and from <br /> \frac{a}{b+c}= \frac{b}{a+ c}<br /> we get a^2+ ac= b^2+ bc<br /> Subtracting ab- ac= c^2- b^2 or a(b-c)= (c-b)(c+b).<br /> <b>If b- c is not 0</b> we must have a= -(b+c) which would make each ratio -1, but that is exactly the &quot;forbidden&quot; case that a+ b+ c= 0. If b- c = 0, then, using the other equality, we get a= b= c, in which case each ratio is 1/2.
<br /> <br /> I really can&#039;t find words to thank you. Thanks a lot!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top