Maths required for rotation point

  • Thread starter Thread starter karen_lorr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Rotation
AI Thread Summary
To understand the forces and mathematics involved in rotating an object around a fixed point, one should begin by comparing linear motion equations with those of rotational motion. Key concepts include the moment of inertia (I), which varies based on the object's geometry, and the relationship between torque (τ), force (F), and distance (r) from the pivot point. Calculating the required force to initiate rotation involves determining the desired rotational acceleration and applying the equation Στ=Fr=Ia. For non-uniform objects, calculating moment of inertia can be complex and may require integration techniques. Resources like 4Physics provide foundational equations and explanations to aid in this study.
karen_lorr
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi

The first thing to say about this is that I don’t have a clue where to start.

What I’m looking for is somewhere (maybe a website or just a brief introduction) I can study – and learn – about the forces involved and the maths required.

_______

Say I have an item/length/beam/weight/etc (C in the graphic) that can rotate about a point (B in the graphic) which is supported on an unmovable base (A in the graphic).

C can be heaver, taller, have more mass, etc, etc (it can change) although it’s rotation point never changes

What I’m looking for is a way to work out how the properties of C will affect the force required to rotate it around point B.

This is not a homework question (I left school over 40 years ago), it’s just for my own personal interest and education.

Thank you

Here is the graphic (on Microsoft Onedrive). I have put this link as well in case you can't see it.
https://1drv.ms/i/s!AlXOOGaTv36QgQ4hlbbk4IQpmTEX
s!AlXOOGaTv36QgQ4hlbbk4IQpmTEX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I think you should start comparing the equations of linear motion with the respective of rotational motion. You can study some basic equations in this website: https://www.4physics.com/phy_demo/Newton/Newton_rot.htm.

Let's consider this system to be horizontal and the air resistance to be negligible. There is no force exerted on this system initially (no gravity-horizontal system). In this case, the moment of inertia (I) changes when we change the geometry of c. For example if c is a uniform cylinder with radius R and length l and is rotating around b, then: I=(MR^2/4)+(Ml^2/3) where M is the mass of c.

So you must follow these steps:
1) Decide the rotational acceleration (a=dω/dt) with which you want c to start rotating.
2) Calculate the moment of inertia (I) based on the geometrical characteristics of your system.
3) From the equation Στ=Fr=Ia, you can calculate the Force that needs to be exerted on a specific point of the object c.

Have in mind that τ=Fr, where F is the force exerted on the cylinder and r the distance of the point (in which F is exerted) from b.

The difficult step is to calculate the moment of inertia for non-uniform objects, because you need to use the integral of (r^2 dm).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top