Matrices and systems of equations

Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hi

I am now filling in what I perceive to be gaps in my knowledge. One of these problems is understanding why matrices can solve systems of equations. I do completely get Gaussian elimination to solve systems of linear equations. However, when using determinants and the like to solve, for instance, systems of differential equations, I do not feel I have properly learned why that works.

Whenever I pick up a book on systems theory, I am reminded that I understand metric spaces and Lebesgue integration better than something as basic as a matrix. I need to change that.

What book can, through a rigorous manner, explain matrix theory to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost any book on linear algebra will do. "Linear algebra done wrong" by Sergei Treil recently became my favorite linear algebra book.
 
Perhaps it would help to look at a very simple example. Suppose we have the equations ax+ by= c and dx+ ey= f. I decide to eliminate "y" and solve for x. Multiply the first equation by "e": aex+ bey= ce. Multiply the second equation by b: bdx+ bey= bf. Now that y has the same coefficient in each equation, we eliminate y by subtracting: (aex+ bey)- (bdx+ bey)= (ae- bd)x= ce- bf. So, as long as ae- bd is not 0, x= (ce- bf)/(ae- bd).

You can see that this is the same as "As long as \left|\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ d & e\end{array}\right| is not 0,
x= \frac{\left|\begin{array}{cc} c & b \\ f & e \end{array}\right|}{\left|\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ d & e\end{array}\right|}".
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top