[Matrix Algebra] Special matrix, columns as a first order derivatives

math_stat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a_1,...,a_n be Real. Then define a 2n x 2n matrix A as follows.

The following are the first 4 and the last 2 columns;
note that the (2k) column equals (a_k)(derivative of the (2k-1) column

A[,1] = a_1^(2n),a_1^(2n-1),a_1^(2n-2),...,a_1^(2), a_1

A[,2] = (2n)a_1^(2n),(2n-1)a_1^(2n-1),(2n-2)a_1^(2n-2),...,2a_1^(
2), a_1

A[,3] = a_2^(2n),a_2^(2n-1),a_2^(2n-2),...,a_2^(2), a_2

A[,4] = (2n)a_2^(2n),(2n-1)a_2^(2n-1),(2n-2)a_2^(2n-2),...,2a_2^(2), a_2
.
.
.
A[,2n-1] = a_n^(2n),a_n^(2n-1),a_n^(2n-2),...,a_n^(2), a_n

A[,2n] = (2n)a_n^(2n),(2n-1)a_n^(2n-1),(2n-2)a_n^(2n-2),...,2a_n^(2), a_n

Calulate det(A)

Homework Equations



I'd like to need to know if there's a special name for this kind of matrix? (It seems to be a special case, which can be generalized to any order derivative)

Also, I outlined my idea below, and I'm curious if there's an easier way of solving this problem

The Attempt at a Solution


I partition A into 4 square matrices, say P,Q,R, and S. Then proceed inductively, with the top-left partition P at step k+1 being equal to the whole A matrix from the previous kth step. This way at each step the dimensions are as follows

top-left P: (2k-2)x(2k-2)
top-right Q: (2k-2)x2
bottom-left R: 2x(2k-2)
bottom-right S: 2x2

Next, at each step, I use det(A)=det(P)det(S-RP^(-1)Q)

This is where I'm getting confused. Can I somehow use the dependence between the columns without going through all the gory calculations?

Appreciate any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There seem to be some obvious row and column operations to fiddle around with, that would simplify your matrix... Did any of them do anything useful?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top