Matrix elements of the secular determinant for trial functions?

MontavonM
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is the quantum part for solving wavefunctions of mulit-electron atoms that need to be approximated by the variation method.

Specifically we are supposed to differentiate this equation using the quotient rule :

E(c1,c2) = [(c1^2*H11 + 2c1c2H12 + c2^2*H22) / (c1^2*S11 + 2c1c2*S12 + c2^2S22)]

Our book only shows the way to do it using the product rule after you bring the bottom onto the initial left side of the equation...

H and S are constants, with c as the adjustable variable of the equation... I think.

I've finished the differentiation but I got a different answer than I should have (we were given the answer)... Could anyone refer me to a website or something that shows the quotient rule? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer using the quotient rule is as follows: E'(c1,c2) = [(2*c1*H11 + 2*c2*H12 - (c1^2*S11 + 2*c1*c2*S12 + c2^2*S22)*(2*c1*H11 + 2*c2*H12)) / (c1^2*S11 + 2*c1*c2*S12 + c2^2*S22)^2]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top