Matrix equation - numeric solving

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anthus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Numeric
Anthus
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,
my problem is to numerically count "lambda" from that kind of equation:
(\lambda ^2 \check{A} + \lambda \check{B} + \check{C}) \vec{v}=0<br />
which means that:
det(\lambda ^2 \check{A} + \lambda \check{B} + \check{C})=0<br />
where A, B and C are n x n matrices, v is unknown vector and "lambda" is unknown.

It is easy to solve it in Matlab using symbolic calculations of determinant to get polynomial, but I write my own program so I can't use it. I have i.e. GSL library. This equation without first or second term is generalized eigensystem, but perhaps not real.
Does anybody know what use to solve that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can turn this into a "first order" eigenproblem with the matrices twice the size

\lambda\begin{pmatrix}A &amp; 0 \cr 0 &amp; I \end{pmatrix} <br /> \begin{pmatrix}\lambda v \cr v \end{pmatrix} <br /> + \begin{pmatrix}B &amp; C \cr -I &amp; 0\end{pmatrix}<br /> \begin{pmatrix}\lambda v \cr v \end{pmatrix} = 0

This works nicely when A is symmetric and/or positive definite.

If matrix C has "nicer" properties than A, you can make a similar eigenproblem with eigenvalues 1/\lambda

Note, the \lambda in the eigenvector is not an issue. So far as the numerical solution of the eigenproblem is concerned, the eigenvector is just an arbitrary vector with 2n elements, and the fact that the top half of the vector happens to be a scalar multiple of the bottom half is just a conincidence.
 
Thank you, I'll think about it :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top