Matrix multiplication preserve order Block matrix

EmmaSaunders1
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hello,

If I have block matrices A,B,C and D all of which are non singular would this relationship hold; my main concern is preserving order of matrix multiplication:

if ADB=C

then AD=B^-1C
D=B^-1CA^-1
D^-1 = (BC^-1A)


Also is it okay to assume the inverse of a block matrix is equal to a matrix that contains as its elements the inverse of each individual block?

Thanks for any help

Emma
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi EmmaSaunders1! :smile:

Your multiplications are a little off.
They should be:

ADB=C
ADBB-1=CB-1
AD=CB-1
D=A-1CB-1
D-1 = (BC-1A)

You can check the last step by calculating DD-1.

(Btw, you can use the x2 just above the reply box to get nice superscripts. :wink:)


And yes, it is okay to assume the inverse of a block matrix is equal to a matrix that contains as its elements the inverse of each individual block.
You can check this by creating an example, and see how the matrices multiply.
 
Thats great thanks for that
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top