Matrix multiplication/Rotations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerbearrrrrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a problem involving matrix multiplication and rotations, specifically demonstrating that the transformation y = Ax represents an anticlockwise rotation of vector x in R^2. Participants express confusion about how to prove a definition and suggest various approaches, such as using geometric interpretations or polar coordinates. There's a focus on understanding the relationship between x and y through the matrix A, which is defined using trigonometric functions. Suggestions include applying the matrix to standard basis vectors and exploring the geometric implications of the transformation. The overall aim is to clarify the concept of rotation in a mathematical context relevant to engineering.
Jerbearrrrrr
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
An engineer came to me with the following problem

Homework Statement


Suppose
y = A x
where x,y \in R^2
and A = \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos \theta &amp; -\sin \theta\\<br /> \sin \theta &amp; \cos \theta \end{array} \right).
Show that y is an anticlockwise rotation of x about the origin.

Homework Equations


None.
Maybe definition of SO(2,R).

The Attempt at a Solution


\square

========

I kind of don't understand the question.
How can you prove a definition?
Is this question not asking something like, "prove that average speed equals distance over time"?
I guess they want the student to draw a load of triangles? Or perhaps express x and y in terms of polar coordinates to make it more obvious that it's a rotation? Or maybe to show that it can be written as a product of two reflections? Or show that |x| = |y|...but that doesn't make any comments about the angle.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think what is being asked of you is to forget about SO(2) and everything. Just draw two point vectors in a 2-d plane separated by an angular distance of \theta.

Now, by just applying your knowledge of geometry, show that the new coordinates of y in terms of the old coordinates x, is the exact same equations as written above in matrix form.
 
Suppose you were to apply that matrix to (1, 0). What would the result be? Suppose you were to apply it to (0, 1)? How do those points relate to (1, 0) and (0, 1)?
 
Thanks. I thought they were after something like that. Expand sin(A+B) and wave some hands.

Kinda just looking for a definition of 'rotation' in the context of "mathematics for engineers" I suppose, since my friend (whom I'm posting on behalf of) couldn't supply one from lecture notes.

To prove a Foo is a Bar, you have to know what Foos and Bars actually are. And I suppose since the only geometry I've done has been in bits of algebra courses, I would naturally think of group-context definitions xD
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top