Matrix multiplication/Rotations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerbearrrrrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Jerbearrrrrr
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
An engineer came to me with the following problem

Homework Statement


Suppose
[itex]y = A x[/itex]
where [itex]x,y \in R^2[/itex]
and [itex]A = \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos \theta & -\sin \theta\\<br /> \sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{array} \right)[/itex].
Show that y is an anticlockwise rotation of x about the origin.

Homework Equations


None.
Maybe definition of SO(2,R).

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\square[/itex]

========

I kind of don't understand the question.
How can you prove a definition?
Is this question not asking something like, "prove that average speed equals distance over time"?
I guess they want the student to draw a load of triangles? Or perhaps express x and y in terms of polar coordinates to make it more obvious that it's a rotation? Or maybe to show that it can be written as a product of two reflections? Or show that |x| = |y|...but that doesn't make any comments about the angle.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think what is being asked of you is to forget about SO(2) and everything. Just draw two point vectors in a 2-d plane separated by an angular distance of \theta.

Now, by just applying your knowledge of geometry, show that the new coordinates of y in terms of the old coordinates x, is the exact same equations as written above in matrix form.
 
Thanks. I thought they were after something like that. Expand sin(A+B) and wave some hands.

Kinda just looking for a definition of 'rotation' in the context of "mathematics for engineers" I suppose, since my friend (whom I'm posting on behalf of) couldn't supply one from lecture notes.

To prove a Foo is a Bar, you have to know what Foos and Bars actually are. And I suppose since the only geometry I've done has been in bits of algebra courses, I would naturally think of group-context definitions xD