Matrix representation for (S1+S2)^2 operator

martina
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've derived the matrix using two different, but equivalent methods (the one described in the above link-Sakurai and by calculating the direct products of Pauli matrices) and it came out the same, yet its eigenvalues are not what I know they must be, so there must be something fundamentally wrong in my procedure, but I just can't detect it. If you happen to know how the matrix looks like without a detailed derivation, I'd be grateful for that too, cause I'm really stuck here :frown:
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top