Matrix representation of ladder operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the matrix representations of ladder operators \( a_+ \), \( a_- \), and \( a_+ a_- \) in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically within Hilbert space. The original poster references equations from Griffiths' text related to these operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the matrix representation of \( a_+ \) to \( a_- \) through conjugate transposition and considers matrix multiplication for \( a_+ a_- \). Some participants question the action of the ladder operators on standard basis vectors, while others express uncertainty about the relevant material in their textbook.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the ladder operators and their matrix representations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of specific equations from Griffiths' text, and there is a recognition that the operators can be represented as matrices with non-zero entries either above or below the diagonal.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the participants not having covered certain chapters in their course, which may limit their understanding of the context for the ladder operators. Additionally, some participants express uncertainty about how to derive specific equations given their current knowledge.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the matrices which represent the following ladder operators a+,a_, and a+a-
All of these operators are supposed to operate on Hilbert space, and be represented by m*n matrices.

Homework Equations



a+=1/square root(2hmw)*(-ip+mwx)
a_=1/square root(2hmw)*(ip+mwx)
a+a_= 1/hw*(H) - 1/2


The Attempt at a Solution



I recognize that once I find the matrix which represents a+, a_ will be represented by the conjugate of the transpose of that matrix. I also can then find a+a_ by matrix multiplication. Not sure about anything else though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the action of the ladder operators onto the standard basis vectors in the state space ?
 
No clue. There is nothing on this in my Griffiths quantum mechanics text that I have seen.
 
Ed Quanta said:
No clue. There is nothing on this in my Griffiths quantum mechanics text that I have seen.

Griffiths does give the equation. It is 4.120 and 4,121 (given in problem 4.18), Second edition.

[tex]L_{\pm} |l, m> = \hbar {\sqrt{l(l+1)-m(m \pm 1)}}|l,m\pm 1>[/tex]
 
But we haven't gotten to chapter 4 yet, or done anything having to do with angular momentum. The ladder operators were introduced with respect to the harmonic oscillator.

Would I still just plug in values for l and m to find the elements of the matrix?

We were told that
(a+)mn=∫ψn(x)(a+)(ψm(x))dx

And same type of definition for (a_)mn only with a_ instead of a+.

Is there any way for me to come up with the equation in Griffiths 4.120 given this information?

I'm sorry if I am slow.
 
Last edited:
Ed Quanta said:
But we haven't gotten to chapter 4 yet, or done anything having to do with angular momentum. The ladder operators were introduced with respect to the harmonic oscillator.

Would I still just plug in values for l and m to find the elements of the matrix?

We were told that
(a+)mn=∫ψn(x)(a+)(ψm(x))dx

And same type of definition for (a_)mn only with a_ instead of a+.

Is there any way for me to come up with the equation in Griffiths 4.120 given this information?

I'm sorry if I am slow.


My APOLOGIES! I was thinking about the ladder operators for angular momenta (I read replies to your posts but not your initial post in details...my bad!:redface: :redface: :frown: :cry: )

My sincerest apologies.

Ok, what you need then is his equation 2.66, page 48 (in the second edition):

[tex]a_+ \psi_n = {\sqrt{n+1}} \psi_{n+1} \,\,\,\,\,\, a_- \psi_n = {\sqrt{n}} \psi_{n-1}[/tex]

If the [itex]\psi_n[/itex] are represented by explicit column vectors (usually the ones with 1 in one slot and zero and the others), it is easy to use that to find the matrix representations of the ladder operators (they will be matrices with entries below or above the diagonal only)

My apologies, again.

Patrick
 
Thanks agaom. Easier than I thought. That is what I got on wikipedia but I wasn't sure why until now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K