Max Dist Frame Moves Down from Initial: 15m

  • Thread starter Thread starter princessfrost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum downward movement of a frame suspended from a spring when a lump of putty is dropped onto it. The spring constant was correctly calculated as 29.4 N/m. The initial approach incorrectly assumed the force of the putty was 1.96 N without considering the height from which it was dropped. By applying conservation of energy principles, the correct maximum distance the frame moves down is determined to be 0.25 m, combining the initial stretch of the spring and the additional movement due to the putty's impact. The final conclusion suggests that the calculations leading to 0.25 m are accurate.
princessfrost
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A 0.150-kg frame, when suspended from a coil spring, stretches the spring 0.050 m. A 0.200-kg lump of putty is dropped from rest onto the frame from a height of 30.0 cm.

Find the maximum distance the frame moves downward from its initial position in meters.




First I found the spring constant, k, which is given by F = -kx.

F = -kx
k = -F/x = -(0.150kg *9.8 m/s2)/(0.050m) = 29.4 N/m

Next, I found the force that the lump of putty makes on the frame. The force is given by F = ma. The mass of the putty, 0.200kg, and the acceleration which is due to gravity, -9.8m/s2.

F = ma = 0.200kg * -9.8m/s2 = 1.96 N

Now the spring constant, k (29.4N/m), and the force of the putty, 1.96N, so I finally solve for the distance the frame moves.

F = -kx
x = -k/F = -(29.4N/m)/(1.96N) = -15m

It is negative, because it moves in the -x direction.

So, the frame moves 15m downwards is what I get but my program says it is wrong. Can someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This part looks OK:

First I found the spring constant, k, which is given by F = -kx.

F = -kx
k = -F/x = -(0.150kg *9.8 m/s2)/(0.050m) = 29.4 N/m

For the next part, the 1.96 N is not the force that the putty exerts on the frame, since the putty was released 0.3 m above the frame. You can consider conservation of energy to get the distance the spring will go to bring the putty to a stop.
 
Ok. so how about:

1/2mv^2= 1/2 kx^2

F= - k x
where F= mg = (0.150-) (9.80m/s2)
F = 1.47 N
1.47 N= -k ( - 0.050 )
k = 1.47N/0.050m
k = 29.4N/m
then:
v22 = v12 - 2gh, where v1 = 0 and h =- 30 cm = - 0.30m
v22 = - 2(9.80m/s2)(- 0.30m)
v22 = 5.88
v2 = 2.425 m/s
Now, plugging these values in I get
mv2 = k x2
x2 = mv2/k = (0.200)(5.88 m2/s2)/(29.4N/m)
x2 = 0.04
x = 0.2 m

So the maximum distance is:
X = 0.05 m + 0.20 m
X = 0.25 m

Is this right?
 
Looks OK to me.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top