Max Height of Rolling Ball & Kinetic Energy Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter BMW25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Important
AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum height a hollow ball reaches on an incline after rolling at 3.4 m/s, all its kinetic energy converts to potential energy at the peak. The height can be calculated using the formula for gravitational potential energy. For the solid sphere weighing 2.4 kg and rolling at 6.6 m/s, its translational kinetic energy can be found using the formula KE_trans = 0.5 * m * v^2, while the rotational kinetic energy requires the moment of inertia and angular velocity. The rotational kinetic energy for a solid sphere can be derived from its rolling motion, considering the radius and speed of a point on its circumference. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving both problems effectively.
BMW25
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
two question important !

1) A hollow ball is rolling along a horizontal surface at 3.4 m/s when it encounters an upward incline. If it rolls without slipping up the incline, what maximum height will it reach?
h= ...meter

2) A solid 2.4 kg sphere is rolling at 6.6 m/s . Find (a) its translational kinetic energy and (b) its rotational kinetic energy.


pleeeeeeeeeeeeease help me with that as soon as possible
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1, What is it's kinetic energy - if it stops at the top of the incline all this goes into potential energy what is the height.

2, You need the equation for rotational ke of a solid sphere (it's in wiki or your textbook)
Then since it is rolling you can get the radius from considering how fast a point on the circumference is moving along the plane.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top