Max Intensity of 2 Waves: E^2(E_01 +- E_02)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity Waves
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Show that the maximum intensity of 2 waves is worth (E_{01}+E_{02})^2 while for 2 waves out of phase by pi rad, it's worth (E_{01}-E_{02})^2.


Homework Equations


Not sure about intensity. According to my notes it's worth (U_1+U_2)(U_1+U_2)* where * denotes the complex conjugate. And U(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\eta}}E(x).
Also \eta=\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\mu _0}{\varepsilon _0}}}{n} where n is the refractive index of the medium. Is there some easier formula for the intensity that I could use?

The Attempt at a Solution


As they don't say anything if the 2 waves have the same frequency, I think that indeed they have the same frequency otherwise it's senseless to talk of a phase. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we talk of superposition of waves a phasor treatment provides
Ar2 = A12 + A22 + 2A1A2cosT
where T is the phase difference. Now knowing that intensity is proportional to amplitude squared and using conditions for constructive and destructive interference you can easily show the required results.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top