Max Phases in Binary Mixture EQ: Gibbs Phase Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgnk708113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the maximum number of phases in a binary mixture at equilibrium using the Gibbs phase rule, represented by the equation F=C-P+2. Participants clarify that for a binary mixture, the number of components (C) is 2. The calculations suggest that if C=2, the maximum number of phases (P) can be 4, while if one mole fraction is known (C=1), the maximum phases would be 3. Ultimately, the consensus is that for a binary mixture, the maximum number of phases is indeed 4. Understanding the correct application of the Gibbs phase rule is crucial for solving such problems.
hgnk708113
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Acording to the Gibbs phase rule, what is the maximum number of phases that one may observe for a binary mixture in equilibrium?

Homework Equations


phase rule
F=C-P+2

The Attempt at a Solution


It says binary mixture but does it mean there are 2 component(C=2)?
I think we can know one mole fraction and we can know another so C=1
I found the answer for this problem is 4 from 0=2-P+2 P=4
but if C=1 0=1-P+2 P=3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh I lost some words
I mean if one of the two mole fraction is known and the other is known so C=1
what is the correct answer ? maximum number of phase is 3 or 4?
 
Last edited:
hgnk708113 said:
It says binary mixture but does it mean there are 2 component(C=2)?
Yes, that's what it means.
 
  • Like
Likes hgnk708113
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top