Max Range Lab: Solving the Units Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving a unit mismatch in a lab report analyzing maximum projectile range. The user is using a range equation that includes initial velocity, angle, gravitational acceleration, and height, but encounters unit inconsistencies. Eliminating height from the equation improves unit conformity but still results in a 20% discrepancy from expected data. A suggested solution involves adjusting the equation to incorporate V0 cosθ within the radical, leading to a more accurate calculation of range. This adjustment is expected to yield a larger calculated range that aligns better with experimental results.
haxtor21
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am doing a lab report where I have to find a maximum range and at what angle it occurs. For the range equation I am using a range equation with the initial velocity, theta, g and h as variables. There clearly is a problem since my units do not match up, and I can't find what it is. h has to be zero since the projectile was shot at h=0. Eliminating h still doesn't solve the units problem, but the answer does conform more with my data, but still is 20% off.

Homework Equations



V0=4 m/s
theta=45 deg.

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/2074/gedc0204a.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/9617/gedc0205.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you bring the term V0 cosθ inside the radical, and it becomes V02 cos2θ, the first term in the radical should be
V02 cos2θ * V02 sin2θ
= V04 sin2θ cos2θ​
and then the units agree. (And transform to sin22θ as appropriate, of course.)

This will make your calculated R larger.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top