Max velocity for simple pendulum oscillation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the maximum velocity of a simple pendulum, expressed as v_max = w_max * Length of string, where w_max is the maximum angular velocity. Participants explore the relationship between linear and angular motion, referencing the equation v_T = Rω, which relates tangential velocity to angular velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding definitions and deriving equations from fundamental principles, particularly through the context of simple harmonic motion (SHM). There is an emphasis on solving the differential equation associated with SHM to clarify the derivation process. Overall, the discussion seeks to clarify the relationship between angular displacement and linear velocity in the context of pendulum motion.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that v_max = w_max * Length of string where v_max is the velocity of the simple pendulum and w_max is the maximum angular velocity.


Homework Equations


\omega_{velocity} = -\theta_{max} \cdot \omega_{frequency} \cdot sin(\omega_{frequency} \cdot t + \phi)


The Attempt at a Solution


The closest resemblance I could find was using energy:

\frac{1}{2}kx^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv_{max}^2 where x = some displacement. The displacement in this pendulum's clase would be the Length of the string * angular displacement because s = Lθ.

Solving for v_max gives: v_{max} = \omega_{frequency} \cdot x

But the 'x' in this case represents the displacement made by the pendulum (the arclength subtended by the angular displacement).

Is there another equation I'm unaware of?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well yes - via ##v_{T}=R\omega## perhaps?

I think, to understand the problem, you need to say where you have to start from
... possibly by deriving the equation for "v" - however it has been defined.
I don't think you have been very careful with the definitions of terms.
 
You may need to solve the SHM DE of

d2x/dt2 + ω2x = 0

Are you able to solve this DE or know the solutions to this DE? (it is similar to your relevant equation)
 
Simon Bridge said:
Well yes - via ##v_{T}=R\omega## perhaps?

I think, to understand the problem, you need to say where you have to start from
... possibly by deriving the equation for "v" - however it has been defined.
I don't think you have been very careful with the definitions of terms.

Oh, so there is an equation that states ##v_{T}=R\omega##. I did not know this. How do you derive this?

rock.freak667 said:
You may need to solve the SHM DE of

d2x/dt2 + ω2x = 0

Are you able to solve this DE or know the solutions to this DE? (it is similar to your relevant equation)
My relevant equation is just the derivative to this solution. I didn't think the angular position equation was more useful than its derivative so I only included the equation for angular velocity.
 
PhizKid said:
My relevant equation is just the derivative to this solution. I didn't think the angular position equation was more useful than its derivative so I only included the equation for angular velocity.

Yes and that is why I thought by show, you would have had to show the steps in the derivation towards the DE.
 
PhizKid said:
Oh, so there is an equation that states ##v_{T}=R\omega##. I did not know this. How do you derive this?
<puzzled> the pendulum is an example of circular motion:

The distance ##s## on an arc, radius ##r##, changes with angle ##\theta## as ##ds=r d\theta## (follows from the definition of "angle"). To get the tangential velocity ##v_{T}## just divide through by ##dt##.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top