Maximizing Accuracy in K Type Thermocouple Measurements

AI Thread Summary
When selecting a K Type thermocouple, the configuration of the probe, including its length, can impact measurement accuracy, particularly due to the heatsink effect on small sources. Price differences among K Type probes may not significantly affect accuracy, as the main source of error often lies in the measurement system as a whole rather than the thermocouple itself. The accuracy of the thermocouple wire is contingent on its purity, and the temperature measurement relies on the differential between the ends of the wire. Proper reference temperature measurement is crucial; inaccuracies in the reference can compromise the overall accuracy of the system. Understanding these factors is essential for maximizing accuracy in K Type thermocouple measurements.
fictionx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm looking to buy an accurate K Type thermocouple and I have a couple questions concerning accuracy before I make my decision.
-If it is a K Type thermocouple, does it matter how the probe is configured? e.g. length etc.?
-Is there any discrepency in accuracy between different priced probes? (assuming they are all K type)
-If I already have a K Type probe will that have no problem matching the new thermocouple?

FYI here is the thermocouple I am looking at buying:
The accuracy is ±(0,05% v.Mw. + 0,3°C)
and the temperature resolution is 0,1°C

Thank you in advance,
fictionx
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For my expericence, the accuracy of thermocouple measure system (including sensor, record) are always >0.5℃ even after calibration.

And the main error for temperature measure is not the sensor self, but the way how stick it to target and which size of thermocouple you used (for small source, the thermocouple has notable "heatsink effect", which decrease the source temperature)
 
I have worked with K type thermocouple instruments. As far as I know the temp accuracy of the thermocouple wire should be as consistent as the thermocouple wire is pure. A length of K type wire with one end having the wires shorted will generate a voltage at the open end of the wire based on the difference in temp from one end to the other. It is NOT an absolute thing. It is a diffential from one end to the other. Sooooo, to get a meaningful measurement of the temp at the shorted end of the wire we need to know the temp at the open end of the wire (reference). This can be a significant inaccuracy in the system. If you have a thermistor with poor repeatability/accuracy to determine the reference temp then the whole thing is no more accurate than that crappy reference. Of course the small voltage that the thermocouple generates needs to be amplified. The linearity and accuracy of the amplifier can introduce more error in the measurement. In other words, I don't believe the thermocouple probe itself is the largest source of error. Maybe how it is attached to what it is trying to measure could be, but that is a different issue. Did this help?
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top