Maximizing Bending Moment in Simply Supported Beams: An Experimental Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter oxon88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a simply supported beam, focusing on determining the maximum bending moment, calculating deflections, and verifying results experimentally using strain gauges. Participants engage in a detailed exploration of the theoretical and practical aspects of beam mechanics, including calculations and diagram constructions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants discuss the steps needed to analyze the beam, including setting up free body diagrams and calculating support reactions.
  • Some participants propose methods for constructing shear and bending moment diagrams based on calculated values.
  • There is a discussion about the M/I diagram and its relevance, with some participants explaining its use in calculating deflection when the moment of inertia varies.
  • One participant questions the validity of their bending moment calculations, leading to clarifications about units and the relationship between shear force and bending moment.
  • Participants explore the application of superposition and Macaulay’s Method for calculating deflections due to multiple loads.
  • There is a noted discrepancy in calculated maximum deflection values, prompting discussions about the correct formulas and methods to use.
  • Some participants highlight that the maximum bending moment and maximum deflection do not necessarily occur at the same point along the beam.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methods for calculating bending moments and deflections, but there are disagreements regarding specific calculations and the application of certain formulas. The discussion remains unresolved on some points, particularly concerning the discrepancies in deflection calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the proper formulas to use for specific load cases and the implications of unsymmetrical loading on bending moments and deflections. There are references to external resources for clarification, but no consensus is reached on the best approach to resolve the discrepancies noted.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in engineering and physics fields, particularly those interested in structural analysis and beam mechanics.

  • #31
All you have to do is compare the expressions for deflection for a point load versus the distributed load.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ok Thank you. so my figures for deflection look acceptable?
 
  • #33
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #34
Q3. What I value for the beam would be required to halve the maximum
deflection of the beam?

A. In order to halve the maximum deflection of the beam, the value of I would need to be doubled to 300x10-6m4, this is because the deflection δ is inversely proportional to I
 
  • #35
does the above answer look acceptable?
 
  • #36
Yes.
 
  • #37
ok thanks.

Are you able to provide some guidance on the last question?

4. The calculation for the maximum bending moment is to be verified
experimentally using a strain gauge bonded to the outer surface of the
beam, at the point where the maximum bending moment occurs.
Derive an equation which could be used to calculate the bending
moment from the measured strain value. State the meaning of all
symbols used in your equation.
 
  • #38
Can't help with this part. Don't know anything about strain gauges and have never worked with them.
 
  • #39
Im not sure the strain gauge part is all that relevant. Just looking to Derive an equation which could be used to calculate the bending moment from the measured strain value.


the strain is the ratio of the deflection to the radius of curvature


e = δ / R = Mδ / EI


e=strain
δ=Deflection
E=young's modulus
I=the second moment of area of section about neutral axis
M=the bending moment at the section concerned
R=radius of curvature of bent beam
 
  • #40
Which formulas did you use for the various deflections? I am having a real nightmare trying to work this out
 
  • #41
Big Jock said:
Which formulas did you use for the various deflections? I am having a real nightmare trying to work this out

Re-read the earlier posts in this thread. There is a reference to the deflection formulas.
 
  • #42
Still a little lost with this. The question asks to Plot a graph of the deflection along the length of the beam
(calculate the deflection at 1 m intervals). So unsure which formulas to use for the 5kN udl the 20 and 30 kN point loads. So if that deflection or maximum deflection and why would you need the slope for this isn't that something completely different from the asked question?
 
  • #43
It's very simple. The problem asks that you calculate and plot the values of the beam deflection at 1 m intervals along the length of the beam. Sure, the beam will have a maximum deflection associated with a particular loading, but the beam deflection is not zero at other points on the beam. The formulas in the beam table allow one to select a distance from one end of the beam at which deflection is to be calculated. The beam table includes formulas for the deflection due to a UDL and point loads. Remember, the total deflection due to several different loads is the sum of the deflection due to each load by itself. This part of the question is basically plug and chug and plot the results.
 
  • #44
I know this but unsure which formulas to use for the 5kN udl and the 20 and 30kN point loads for the distances of x=0-10 this is where my problem lies. I think the udl formula should be w/EI(Lx^2/12-x^4/24-L^3/24) and the point load formula w/EI(x^3/12-L^2x/16) is this correct? I so I then have all the various deflection point for all the info then sum them together?...
 
  • #45
I don't recognize your formulas for the deflections. Did you read the earlier posts in this thread? If you go to Post #26, the reference there gives deflection formulas for cantilever beams on p. 1 and simply supported beams on p. 2.
 
  • #46
Yeah seen them so reference to the attachment beam 7 formula 2 and beam 8 formula 2 would that be correct and give me all the info I need for my graph? The other thing there are two separate formulas for beam 7 formula 2 which one do you use?
 
  • #47
Big Jock said:
Yeah seen them so reference to the attachment beam 7 formula 2 and beam 8 formula 2 would that be correct and give me all the info I need for my graph? The other thing there are two separate formulas for beam 7 formula 2 which one do you use?

It shouldn't be this hard. For the point load, the range of x is given for which each formula is applicable (e.g., formula #1; 0 < x < a). You use the formula which is appropriate for the value of x at which you are calculating deflection. Since you are calculating deflection along the entire length of the beam, you will have used both formulas by the time you complete your calculations.
 
  • #48
Think I have it. Been working on the udl first, for the first metre of the udl y=6.8125x10^-5(micromillimters) would this be the correct measurement for the y-axis or should it be converted to mm?
 
  • #49
Big Jock said:
Think I have it. Been working on the udl first, for the first metre of the udl y=6.8125x10^-5(micromillimters) would this be the correct measurement for the y-axis or should it be converted to mm?

Be careful with your units. I checked you calculation and I come up with a deflection of 6.8125*10-3 m, which is equal to 6.8 mm. If you are not sure, post your work here where I can check it in detail.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #50
5x1/24x200x10^9x150x10^-6(10^3-2x10x1^2+1^3) was what I did. Which I have re done instead of 5 the udl should have been 5000 which gave the figure you quoted. Many, many thanks SteamKing for you patience over this. Glad I asked though as I have learned how to do this now correctly with your help
 
Last edited:
  • #51
You have to be careful in reading the beam diagram. The UDL is 5 kN/m, not 5 N/m.
 
  • #52
oxon88 and SteamKing are the values in the table correct in post 30. I am using these as reference while I' am working them out??...
 
  • #53
They seem to be OK.
 
  • #54
That's what I have found so far. Having a little trouble getting the 30kN load deflection figures and wanted to double check that these were the values I was looking for...
 
  • #55
If you can't resolve your problem, post a sample calculation, like you did for the UDL.
 
  • #56
30000x7x2/6x200x10^9x150x10^-6(10^2x2^2-7^20) Think my problem is what the values of a and b are I have been alternating between 3 and 7 and plugging these into the formulas mentioned but not having much joy whichever way I do it...
 
  • #57
Big Jock said:
30000x7x2/6x200x10^9x150x10^-6(10^2x2^2-7^20) Think my problem is what the values of a and b are I have been alternating between 3 and 7 and plugging these into the formulas mentioned but not having much joy whichever way I do it...

Your calculation isn't coming out correct because you are not using the right equation.

It looks like you are trying to determine deflection for x = 2 m

Use Eq. 7, first part from the attachment, since 0 < 2 < 7:

y = [(P*b*x)/(E*I*L)]*(L^2 - x^2 - b^2)

Part of the confusion is the table uses 'l' for L, and it can be overlooked easily. You forgot to divide by L and in the parenthesis part, you multiplied L^2 by x^2 when you should have subtracted.
 
  • #58
Thanks very much your spot on and all my numbers all look like the others listed and so des my graph. Many thanks again for your patience.
 
  • #59
SteamKing which formula would you use to find the I value to half the maximum deflection in the beam? Which I guess is the sum which at 5m is 49.20mm...
 
  • #60
Look at the formulas you used to calculate deflection. Where is the I used in all of the formulas? What relative value of I would cause the deflection of the beam to be half of its original value?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
23K