Maximizing Velocity in Uniformly Accelerated Motion

AI Thread Summary
A car travels 1800 meters between two traffic lights in 3 minutes, starting and ending at 0 m/s. The car accelerates uniformly for 30 seconds, maintains a constant velocity for 2 minutes, and then decelerates uniformly. To find the maximum uniform velocity, a velocity-time graph can be used, where the area under the graph represents the distance traveled. The graph forms a trapezium, and calculating its area involves using the height (maximum velocity) alongside the dimensions of the trapezium. This approach simplifies the problem and clarifies the solution process.
jh128273
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a car takes 3 mins to travel between 2 sets of traffic lights which are 1800m apart, its velocity at each set of lights is 0ms-1

If the car accelerated uniformly for 30 secs and then maintained a constant velocity for the next 2 mins before retarding uniformly, calculate the the maxumum uniform velocity reached.

Homework Equations



usual suvat

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.
It's probably best done drawing a velocity time graph and using the fact that the area under the graph is the distance travelled.
Have you tried that?
 
Thanks for the quick reply.

Yes I have looked at that but as I didnt have a velocity it seemed useless.

I think I'm struggling as there is only 2 components to use i.e. time and total distance.

I'll keep trying :)

cheers
 
The shape of the graph is a trapezium. If you know the formula for its area you have all you need to find the "height" of it. (Height= maximum velocity of car)
If you don't know the formula, treat the graph as 2 triangles and a rectangle and write down the area of each of those 3 shapes in term of the "height" of the graph.
Triangle area is half base times height. Rectangle is length times height.
 
Yip, that done it...lol thanks a lot for your help, it has cheers me up after a freak out earlier. I think I've been looking into further than was needed.

Thanks again,

Jeff
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top