Maximum angle which a field line starting from Q will end at infinity

Wxfsa
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://i.imgur.com/haX3OW8.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I guess a) is 1/3 (probably wrong, because I assumed all the field lines that end at -q originates at +3q which is not necessarily true) but I can't figure out b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Wxfsa. Welcome to PF!

Wxfsa said:
I guess a) is 1/3 (probably wrong, because I assumed all the field lines that end at -q originates at +3q which is not necessarily true)

That sounds pretty good to me. Recall that for an electric dipole (where the positive and negative charges have equal magnitude), then every field line that ends on the negative charge starts on the positive charge. (You can forget about the one pesky line that comes into the negative charge from infinity.) In your case, the positive charge has "extra" charge and the field lines that go to infinity must originate on the positive charge.

but I can't figure out b)

Consider a very tiny sphere centered on the positive charge. Can you visualize the electric field lines piercing through the surface of that sphere? How are the lines distributed over the surface?
 
TSny said:
Can you visualize the electric field lines piercing through the surface of that sphere?

I can't, unfortunately.
 
You know that the electric field of a point charges varies with distance as 1/r2. So, when you get very close to a point charge, the field of the point charge becomes very large.

If you have a system of point charges and you get very close to one of the charges, then the field of that point charge will be much larger than the field of any other point charge in the system. So, to a very good approximation, the field very near the point charge will be the same as that of the point charge alone.
 

Attachments

  • Field 2 pt charges 2.jpg
    Field 2 pt charges 2.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 459
Wxfsa said:
I can't, unfortunately.

If the sphere is VERY tiny like TSny said, they pretty much all go straight out. What fraction of them terminate on the negative charge? Look at the picture in problem hint again.
 
As far as my visualization abilities go, I would say theta is somewhere around 110-120 but I have no idea how I can actually calculate it.

EDIT: I think I got it arccos(-1/3)=109.5 Thank you for your help.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top