Maximum Floating Needle Diameter Calculation

hcho88
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


First part of the question was "Why is it possible to float a wax-coated stainless steel needle on the surface of water?" and I've already answered that, but I'm having trouble with the second part of the question, which is:

If the surface tension at the interface is 0.073 N/m and the density of the steel needle is 7.8x10^3 kg/m^3, what is the maximum diameter of a needle that can float this way? (Hint: start by finding the weight of the needle. You may assume that the needle is cylindrical in cross-section)


Homework Equations


Density = mass / volume
h = (2\sigmacos\Psi) / (\rhog\alpha)
V of needle = width x (2\Pir^2)
I'm actually not too sure which equations I need...



The Attempt at a Solution


\sigma = 0.073N/m
\rho of stainless steel needle = 7.8x10^3 kg/m^3
Well it says to start by finding the weight of the needle, and I wasn't sure how to approach that in the first place, so I wasn't able to make a start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hikaru1221 said:
Have a look at this site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_tension#Basic_physics See the first picture and you may know what's next to do :wink:

\SigmaF = 0
-W + (\sigmaL)cos\vartheta + (\sigmaL)cos\vartheta = 0
W = 2(\sigmaL)cos\vartheta
W = 2 x 0.073 x L x 1
W = 0.146L N

Is this correct?
I have absolutely no idea what to do next.
Just guessing, please correct me if I'm wrong...
Mass of needle = 0.146L/9.8 kg
Volume of needle = (\Pir^2)*L
Volume of needle = 1/(\rhom) = 1/(7.8x10^3 x 0.015L) = 8.61x10^-3L m^3
So 8.61x10^-3L = (\Pir^2)*L
8.61x10^-3 = \Pir^2
r = 0.05 m

I've found a radius of some sort, but I don't think it's right.
The question says I need to find the maximum diameter of a needle that can float.
How do I find this?
 
Last edited:
Hold on...
I have another theory! Please tell me which one is wrong or right or both are wrong! :S
\SigmaF = 0
-W + (\sigmaLcos\theta) + (\sigmaLcos\theta) = 0
W = 2(\sigmaL)cos\theta
W = 2 x 0.073 x L x 1
W = 0.146L N

And using another formula:
P = (2\sigma) / r
P = 101325 Pa
So, r = (2 x 0.073) / 101325
r = 1.44x10^-6 m

Or is this formula only used for bubbles?

anyway, my other answer to this problem being
d=2r
d=2.88x10^-6m

Please tell me where I went wrong and how I should tackle this problem to solve it.
Please give me directions!
Thank you!
 
8.61\times 10^-3L = \pi r^2L
You have gone this far and there is just one more minor step to the result :wink: L is canceled as it appears in both sides, so there is only 1 unknown left :biggrin: By the way, please check your numerical values, because I'm too lazy to check them :biggrin:

P = (2LaTeX Code: \\sigma ) / r
P = 101325 Pa
So, r = (2 x 0.073) / 101325
r = 1.44x10^-6 m
So there is no need for the weight, right?
The effect is due to surface tension, not ambient pressure.

EDIT: I've just read again your post and found you made some corrections. You were on the right track at post #3. Now I'll organize it a bit:
W=2\sigma Lcos\theta
\rho g \pi r^2L=2\sigma Lcos\theta
r=\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma cos\theta}{\rho g \pi}}
As you can see, r is max when cos(theta) is max, and max of cos(theta) is 1. You will find that r_{max} = 0.78mm, not so large as 0.05m that you got earlier.
 
Last edited:
Thank you
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top