Maximum Height Reached by Slingshot-Launched Apple?

AI Thread Summary
The maximum height reached by a 125 g apple launched from a slingshot at a 78-degree angle with an initial velocity of 18 m/s is calculated using energy conservation principles. The vertical component of the initial velocity is determined, and the kinetic energy at launch is compared to the potential energy at the peak height. By factoring out mass from the equations, it simplifies the calculation, leading to a maximum height of approximately 15.81 meters. The discussion emphasizes that mass does not affect the outcome in this ideal scenario without air resistance. This analysis provides a clear understanding of projectile motion and energy conservation.
hmlaa
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello! My question is...What is the maximum height obtained by a 125 g apple that is slung from a slingshot at an angle of 78 degrees from the horizontal with an initial velocity of 18 m/s?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any attempts/ideas on your part? This has to do with conservation of energy.
 
I thought I could use .5Vo^2/g but I don't know how to take mass into account =\
 
In an ideal situation without air resistance ect. all mass undergoes same downward acceleration of g near the surface of the earth. Hence, mass is not used in this question.

Start by finding the vertical component of the apple velocity
 
hmlaa said:
hello! My question is...what is the maximum height obtained by a 125 g apple that is slung from a slingshot at an angle of 78 degrees from the horizontal with an initial velocity of 18 m/s?

Thanks!

E1 = E2

The apple is still moving at the top of the arc, so there's still some kinetic energy left over.

KE1 = KE2 + PE2

(1/2) * m * (v1)^2 = (1/2)*m*(v2)^2 + m*g*h2

At the peak of the arc, there is no y-component of velocity. All that's left at the top is the x-component. Since there is no acceleration in the x direction, the x-velocity of the apple at the top will be the same as it was at the beginning

vx1 = vx2 = v2 = v1*cos(78)


Plug v2 into energy equation.

(1/2) * m * (v1)^2 = (1/2)*m*(v1*cos(78))^2 + m*g*h2

Optional step: factor "m" out of every term. The "m"s drop and you're just left with...
(1/2)*(v1)^2 = (1/2)*(v1*cos(78))^2 + g*h2


Solve for h2

h2 = [ (1/2)*m*(v1)^2 - (1/2)*m*(v1*cos(78))^2 ] / (m*g)

= ((1/2)*0.125kg*(18m/s)^2 - (1/2)*0.125kg*(18m/s*cos(78degrees))^2)/(0.125kg*9.80665m/s^2)


h2 = 15.805314 meters

Hope this helps!

-Alex

http://www.alexpleasehelp.com
 
Thank y9u all!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top