Maximum Kinetic Energy of a Particle with Force F = F0e^(–kx)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiowaviator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum kinetic energy of a particle subjected to a force defined by F = F0e^(–kx). The participant successfully applies the Work-Kinetic Energy theorem, recognizing that the work done (W) equals the change in kinetic energy (Kf - Ki), with the particle starting from rest at x = 0. They derive the work done by integrating the force over the distance, ultimately simplifying to W = F0(1/k). The conclusion is reached by multiplying F0 with 1/k, confirming the maximum kinetic energy expression. The participant expresses gratitude for the clarification that helped them finalize their understanding.
kiowaviator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This question is whooping me. I know I have the calculus part right I just don't know where to go from here?

A particle moving along the x-axis is acted upon by a single force F = F0e^(–kx), where F0 and k are constants. The particle is released from rest at x = 0. It will attain a maximum kinetic energy of

F0/k
F0/e^(k)
kF0
1/2(kF0)^2
ke^(k)F0

So using the Work Kinetic Energy theorem
W=Kf-Ki since x=0 then Kf=W

W=integral(F = F0e^(–kx),x,0,xf)
taking F0 out, since its a constant, and integrating the exponential function I get
W=F0[-e^(-kxf)/k + 1/k]

now what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you evaluate the integral one of the terms is zero,

exp(-x) goes to zero as x goes to infinity?
 
I did that, that's why the second term inside the brackets is 1/k, since e^(-k*0)=1.
 
You've pretty much done it now. So you now have 1/k inside the bracket and f0 outside the bracket, so just multiply them together to get the answer.
 
Ok, that makes sense. I was there I just couldn't see it. Thanks all.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top