Maximum power transfer and kirchoffs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on using Kirchhoff's laws and Thevenin's theorem to determine the load resistance (RL) for maximum power transfer in a circuit. The participants clarify that to find RL that maximizes power transfer, one must first calculate the Thevenin equivalent circuit, then apply the maximum power transfer theorem. Confusion arises regarding whether to focus on current or resistance, with consensus that resistance is needed for maximum power transfer calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying circuit analysis techniques and emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of algebra and circuit theory fundamentals. Overall, the thread underscores the necessity of mastering these concepts to effectively solve circuit problems.
Andrew187
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi Folks
I need a bit of help, My weakness is kirchhoffs law and algebra, I know but I still give it a try. For this task I am required to calculate the value of the load (RL) using kirchhoffs and then I have to find the maximum power transfer for the circuit. I have attempted to calculate the load (RL) using kirchhoff now the bit that I am confused on is am I looking for the resistance of the Load (RL) or the current in the load (RL). Which figure is required to calculate the maximum power transfer? is it the current or resistance of the load (RL)? If it is the current is my calculations correct? and if its the resistance I need to calculate, how do I figure that out because I have no clue where to start:(
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The value that you found for I2 is okay. Things go off the rails when you get to the section "Sub I2 into equation (1). You write:
$$I_1 = 15v + \frac{0.293a}{15v} = 15.02$$
which doesn't make sense. The units are not consistent; current is not the same as voltage. Later you have RL = 15.03a, but RL is a resistance, not a current.

Can you state the "Max Power theorem"? Have you looked at Thevenin's theorem (and hence Thevenin equivalent circuits) yet?
 
This is my weakness this assignment is long overdue, I covered this last year now when I am going back through my notes it doesn't make sense:( But come to think of it yes you are correct I need to find the resistance of RL and then use that to find the maximum power transfer. I have covered thevenins and nortons but this task has to be calculated using kirchhoffs to find the resistance of RL, I am lost.
 
Use KVL and KCL to find the Thevenin equivalent. Then apply the Max Power theorem to find RL.
 
I still don't get it by thevanin equivalent and why I should use thevanin equivlent for this? I thought I had to use max power theorum once I determine the resistance for RL?
 
Andrew187 said:
I still don't get it by thevanin equivalent and why I should use thevanin equivlent for this? I thought I had to use max power theorum once I determine the resistance for RL?

That's exactly backwards :smile: Find the Thevenin equivalent first, than add the load RL and use the Max Power theorem to find the value of RL that maximizes the power in RL.
 
I don't get it can't I find the resistance of the load (RL) by using Kirchoffs? and then find the maximum power transfer using the maximum power theorum?
 
Andrew187 said:
I don't get it can't I find the resistance of the load (RL) by using Kirchoffs? and then find the maximum power transfer using the maximum power theorum?

Nope. Any value of RL will form a valid circuit that can be analyzed with KVL/KCL. There's no way to pick a particular value of RL from that.

The problem wants you to find the value of RL that maximizes the power transfer. To do that you need to apply the maximum power theorem. To apply the maximum power theorem you need to simplify the circuit to a form where it can be applied. The Thevenin equivalent is such a circuit.

So. First use Thevenin to reduce the network that will drive the load to its Thevenin equivalent. Then apply the max power theorem to the result to determine RL.
 
I'm lost now, it isn't making sense to me at all.
 
  • #10
Andrew187 said:
I'm lost now, it isn't making sense to me at all.

Perhaps you should review the Max Power Transfer theorem. Take a look at the circuit used to prove it; The Max Power theorem allows you to find the load resistance RL that yields the maximum power transfer from a given source voltage with a series resistance.

This is the same form you should reduce your circuit to in order to apply the theorem to find your value of RL.
 
  • #11
So from what point do I change what I have done in my work? or do I just start all over again?
 
  • #12
Andrew187 said:
So from what point do I change what I have done in my work? or do I just start all over again?

You'll have to decide how you want to go about finding the Thevenin equivalent for the network. You may be able to salvage some of the work you've done. For example, your value of I2 will let you find the open circuit voltage at the network terminals.
 
  • #13
OK I am going to salvage the first part which for I2 I got 0.293a I believe the second bit is nonsense so how do I calculate the voltage output (Vo=V_EF) without load (Rl=∞)?
 
  • #14
Andrew187 said:
OK I am going to salvage the first part which for I2 I got 0.293a I believe the second bit is nonsense so how do I calculate the voltage output (Vo=V_EF) without load (Rl=∞)?

What component is the Vo across?
 
  • #15
gneill said:
What component is the Vo across?

Is it across all the resistors, R7,R8,R9,R10?
 
  • #16
Andrew187 said:
Is it across all the resistors, R7,R8,R9,R10?

Pick one... which resistor would you place the leads of a meter across in order to measure Vo?
 
  • #17
gneill said:
Pick one... which resistor would you place the leads of a meter across in order to measure Vo?

Between R8 and R10 ?
 
  • #18
Andrew187 said:
Between R8 and R10 ?

No. The load (RL) is not connected between R8 and R10. What component is RL in parallel with?
 
  • #19
R10 so would I measure across E and F?
 
  • #20
Andrew187 said:
R10 so would I measure across E and F?

Right.

attachment.php?attachmentid=57884&stc=1&d=1366035456.gif


Now, where does your I2 flow...
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    11.6 KB · Views: 585
  • #21
I2 flows in R8 R9 and R10?
 
  • #22
Andrew187 said:
I2 flows in R8 R9 and R10?

Yes, so what's Vo?
 
  • #23
gneill said:
Yes, so what's Vo?

R8+R9+R10/ 0.293a= 25Ω+7Ω+24Ω/ 0.293a= 5.23v is that correct?
 
  • #24
Andrew187 said:
R8+R9+R10/ 0.293a= 25Ω+7Ω+24Ω/ 0.293a= 5.23v is that correct?

No. Vo is across R10 only! You know the current through R10. Vo is equal to the potential drop across R10. So use Ohm's law on R10.
 
  • #25
gneill said:
No. Vo is across R10 only! You know the current through R10. Vo is equal to the potential drop across R10. So use Ohm's law on R10.

V =IR= V= 0.293a*24Ω=7.032v
 
  • #26
Andrew187 said:
V =IR= V= 0.293a*24Ω=7.032v

Yes. (If you keep a few more decimal places for intermediate values you'd find 7.037 V).

So that's the open circuit potential for the circuit, and thus the Thevenin voltage Vth.
What's the next step for finding the Thevenin equivalent?
 
  • #27
I think its Isc? but for that I need to find I1 so how would I go about that?
 
  • #28
You can either find Isc or directly determine the equivalent resistance of the network as seen from Vo.

To find Isc, redraw the circuit with the short in place and determine the current. To find Req, suppress the source and determine the equivalent resistance via simplification of the network.
 
  • #29
Is the drawing correct?
 

Attachments

  • Max power transfer.png
    Max power transfer.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 525
  • #30
Looks good.
 
  • #31
gneill said:
Looks good.

Ok we are getting there lol I just need a clue how to work out I1 as I believe I need that for the ISC?
 
  • #32
Andrew187 said:
Ok we are getting there lol I just need a clue how to work out I1 as I believe I need that for the ISC?

:confused: Are you going to find the equivalent resistance from your diagram, or go the Isc route?

When determining the Thevenin equivalent you want to determine the Thevenin voltage Vth (the open circuit voltage, which you've done), and the Thevenin resistance. The Thevenin resistance can be found in two ways: 1) determine the short circuit current Isc for the network and divide Vth by Isc, or 2) suppress the sources and determine the equivalent resistance of the network looking back into it from the output.

In this case, I think the second method looks simpler as it's a pretty basic network with opportunities for simplification.
 
  • #33
Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0
 
  • #34
Andrew187 said:
Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0

yes, and so,...
 
  • #35
gneill said:
yes, and so,...

I2 = 0.81a?
 
  • #36
Andrew187 said:
I2 = 0.81a?

Yes. Carry on,... what's the Thevenin resistance?
 
  • #37
gneill said:
Yes. Carry on,... what's the Thevenin resistance?

7.032v/0.81a=8.68 ohm ?
 
  • #38
Andrew187 said:
7.032v/0.81a=8.68 ohm ?

Yes. Carry on... draw the Thevenin equivalent circuit with the load RL attached. What value of RL maximizes the power transfer (Max Power theorem).
 
  • #39
gneill said:
Yes. Carry on... draw the Thevenin equivalent circuit with the load RL attached. What value of RL maximizes the power transfer (Max Power theorem).

That bits not the problem I don't know how I worked out the value for I1 and how I got Isc to 0.81a
 
  • #40
Andrew187 said:
That bits not the problem I don't know how I worked out the value for I1 and how I got Isc to 0.81a

:confused:
You wrote the equations for the circuit with the output shorted and solved for the current I2, which is identical to Isc... If there's some part that you didn't understand, stop and ask before moving on.
 
  • #41
gneill said:
yes, and so,...

Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0

This Is the bit I didn't understand i took this out of my notes I know here that the value of I2=0.293a, but I didn't quite understand how I worked out I1.
 
  • #42
Andrew187 said:
Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0

This Is the bit I didn't understand i took this out of my notes I know here that the value of I2=0.293a, but I didn't quite understand how I worked out I1.

Can you be more specific about what you don't understand? You have written two equations in two unknowns, which can be solved using whatever technique you're familiar with. What part is stumping you?

1. Writing the equations from the circuit.
2. Solving two equations for two unknowns.
 
  • #43
gneill said:
Can you be more specific about what you don't understand? You have written two equations in two unknowns, which can be solved using whatever technique you're familiar with. What part is stumping you?

1. Writing the equations from the circuit.
2. Solving two equations for two unknowns.

Writing it shouldn't be a problem but solving the two equations from the two unknowns is a problem I know the answer but don't know how I solved it.
 
  • #44
Andrew187 said:
Writing it shouldn't be a problem but solving the two equations from the two unknowns is a problem I know the answer but don't know how I solved it.

Then it sounds like you need to review your algebra and simultaneous equation solving. This is a fundamental skill that you must have in order to solve problems in any technical discipline. A web search on "solving simultaneous equations" will turn up some on-line tutorials.
 
  • #45
gneill said:
Then it sounds like you need to review your algebra and simultaneous equation solving. This is a fundamental skill that you must have in order to solve problems in any technical discipline. A web search on "solving simultaneous equations" will turn up some on-line tutorials.

Sorry what I was meant to say was solving the equation isn't really the problem because I can sit till the cow's come home calculating the unknowns I eventually get there but the bit I struggle with is writing the equations and drawing the correct diagram, because when I try to look at notes and books its always done differrent to the way in which I want to achieve. So This is where I am at, I have found the value of RL I also know the unknowns but I 'm not sure what format and what diagrams to use bearing in mind I have used kirchhoffs and thevenins equivalent I think.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • #46
Andrew187 said:
Sorry what I was meant to say was solving the equation isn't really the problem because I can sit till the cow's come home calculating the unknowns I eventually get there but the bit I struggle with is writing the equations and drawing the correct diagram, because when I try to look at notes and books its always done differrent to the way in which I want to achieve. So This is where I am at, I have found the value of RL I also know the unknowns but I 'm not sure what format and what diagrams to use bearing in mind I have used kirchhoffs and thevenins equivalent I think.

If I may be frank with you, Andrew187, I get the impression from the way this thread has progressed that you don't really have an adequate grasp on any of the techniques or concepts required to solve the problem, or even a solid understanding of the problem itself (what steps are required to determine which result). You should probably look for some tutorials to firm up your fundamentals.
 
  • #47
Thevenine req

i have tried to short both bateries for finding rth but i can't understand how to solve to find rth... can someone please help me finding rth..
 

Attachments

  • Fullscreen capture 4152013 42310 AM.bmp.jpg
    Fullscreen capture 4152013 42310 AM.bmp.jpg
    16.5 KB · Views: 431
  • #48
hussain bani said:
i have tried to short both bateries for finding rth but i can't understand how to solve to find rth... can someone please help me finding rth..

You should have started a new thread with your question. By asking a new question at the end of an already existing thread, you have "hijacked" someone else's thread.

Hopefully, a moderator will split this off to a new thread.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top