Maximum Power Transfer for Coupled Emitter Follower

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum AC power delivered to a load in an emitter follower circuit. The calculated output resistance is 19.2Ω, and the operating point voltage at the emitter is 10.7V. The confusion arises regarding the maximum AC voltage and why only half of it appears across the load resistor, leading to a calculated power of 0.75W instead of the initially computed 2.25W. It is clarified that the load is modeled in parallel with the output, resulting in a division of voltage and current, which aligns with theoretical expectations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the circuit's behavior in both theoretical and practical contexts.
engineer_ja
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the attached emitter follower circuit, calculate the maximum ac power (Sinusoidal signal) delivered to an attached load.

I have already calculated Rout of the circuit as 19.2Ω, and the voltage at the emitter at operating point (no input signal) as 10.7V (I know these to be correct).


Homework Equations


Ohms Law
Power equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Max Power transfer implies a load resistor f Rl=Ro=19.2Ω
The maximum amplitude sine wave that could be applied at emitter before railing is 20V-10.7V=9.3V
This is an rms value of6.58V
A sine wave of this rms voltage across the load would give (6.58V)^2/19.2Ω = 2.25W of Power.

The answer however says "emitter voltage at operating point = 10.7V. this is equivalent to an rms of 7.57V" - I don't understand why we us this voltage.
it then says "only half this appears across the load resistor (3.79V)" - I don't understand why. Isn't the ac voltage across the load equal to the ac voltage at the emitter?
this then gives the correct answer as "(3.79V)^2/19.2 = 0.75W"

Any help in explaining this would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Attachment

Image was .tiff so didn't attach, here is a jpeg.
 

Attachments

  • EF.jpg
    EF.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 474
How did you compute R_out? Not with small-signal analysis I hope.

Anyway, the question makes little sense. The max load in reality would be set by max transistor power dissipation. A 19.2 ohm load is absurd. Even with a beta of 100 tyat's a 1.9K load reflected back to the base,;the tranbsistor would be grossly loaded down. The bias operating point would be grossly upset.
Etc.
 
engineer_ja said:

Homework Statement



For the attached emitter follower circuit, calculate the maximum ac power (Sinusoidal signal) delivered to an attached load.

I have already calculated Rout of the circuit as 19.2Ω, and the voltage at the emitter at operating point (no input signal) as 10.7V (I know these to be correct).


Homework Equations


Ohms Law
Power equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Max Power transfer implies a load resistor f Rl=Ro=19.2Ω
The maximum amplitude sine wave that could be applied at emitter before railing is 20V-10.7V=9.3V
This is an rms value of6.58V
A sine wave of this rms voltage across the load would give (6.58V)^2/19.2Ω = 2.25W of Power.

The answer however says "emitter voltage at operating point = 10.7V. this is equivalent to an rms of 7.57V" - I don't understand why we us this voltage.
it then says "only half this appears across the load resistor (3.79V)" - I don't understand why. Isn't the ac voltage across the load equal to the ac voltage at the emitter?
this then gives the correct answer as "(3.79V)^2/19.2 = 0.75W"

Any help in explaining this would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.

Presumably the other half apears across the decoupling capacitor.
 
engineer_ja said:
Any help in explaining this would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.
It's a bit puzzling. If you have simulation software, I think you should simulate this and run it for various values of load and input. Record the waveshapes to see how well it holds up.
 
Hi, this isn't real life, its a textbook question.

The question started with identifying the class of amplifier and then finding Ib for hFE=50 and VBE=0.7 for no input supplied. this comes out as 105 muA.
Then using small signal parameters calculate small signal gain and voltage. This again gave m G=0.981 and Ro=19.2 Ohm. these are correct by the mark scheme.

It then asks what the max ac power that can be transferred is. Following 'theory', not reality, this suggests matching the impedances and putting 19.2 Ohm as the load resistor (again correct by the markscheme). My problem is then how the answer calculates max power. I don't how they get their theoretical maximum sine wave as 10.7V, or why they say only half the voltage appears across the load (surely the load is modeled in parallel with output so the full ac voltage appears across it?).
 
engineer_ja said:
It then asks what the max ac power that can be transferred is. Following 'theory', not reality, this suggests matching the impedances and putting 19.2 Ohm as the load resistor (again correct by the markscheme).
I understand your line of thought, and your method is the way I would have proceeded.

My problem is then how the answer calculates max power. I don't how they get their theoretical maximum sine wave as 10.7V, or why they say only half the voltage appears across the load (surely the load is modeled in parallel with output so the full ac voltage appears across it?).
If you model the output as a Norton source feeding a parallel pair of resistances, then, yes, you can say each resistance gets the full voltage though only half the current. Equivalently, you could see the output as a Thévenin source feeding a pair of series resistances, with each getting the full current though only half the voltage. It is two different ways of expressing the same thing.
 
Right, I'll have to work through that but it seems to make sense.

Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top