Maximum radius given rps, static and kinetic friction coefficients

AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum radius at which a pizza crumb can remain on a rotating magnetic disk, one must equate the centripetal force required for circular motion with the maximum static frictional force. The static friction force is calculated using the static coefficient of friction and the normal force, which is perpendicular to the disk's surface. The discussion emphasizes that static friction applies until movement occurs, at which point kinetic friction becomes relevant but is not needed for this problem. The key is to find the maximum horizontal acceleration that can be sustained without slipping, which is determined by the static friction coefficient. Understanding these forces is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
tehnexus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A computer scientist has dropped a tiny pizza crumb onto a magnetic disk. Later, when it's turned on, the disk is rotating at 88 revolutions per second about its axis, which is vertical. The coefficients of kinetic and static friction between pizza crumbs and the disk are 1.3 and 1.5 respectively. What is the maximum radius from the axis at which a pizza crumb will stay on the disk?

Homework Equations



F=ma, a=v^2/r, v=rω

The Attempt at a Solution



i really am not sure how to do this question, am i supposed to equate the centripetal force on the crumb with the frictional force? i have converted the rps to rad/s which is 552.93. please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of things to consider here. The first thing is understanding the forces on the object.
F_M = \mu_s * F_N
F_M = Maximum force of friction
\mu_s = Static coefficient of friction
F_N = Normal force

Static friction doesn't always produce a force. It only produces a force up to a maximum in opposition to motion on a plane. Now you already mentioned centripetal force. This is the force that is required to make something rotate. If you don't have enough centripetal force, then you don't have a solid orbit. Normal force is perpendicular to the plane of motion. Can you think of any forces that are perpendicular to the plane of motion? Basically what we need to find is what horizontal centripetal force exceeds the perpendicular normal force times the coefficient.

F = ma

We don't know the mass, but we know the forces in question are applied to the same mass, so what matters is the acceleration. If you can figure out an acceleration acting perpendicular to the disc, then you should be able to find the maximum horizontal acceleration toward the center that can occur with the static coefficient of friction.
 
So the kinetic friction coefficient does not affect the question? but i understand what you are saying thanks.
 
Last edited:
Correct. Static friction is a ratio that represents how well two things are stuck together. It is all that applies until we have movement between the objects. Once we have movement you kind of get a skipping motion on the microscopic level. Think of it like two pieces of metal that have fitting triangular teeth on their surface. If you press against them and push, they will stay together. If you ever managed to push hard enough the teeth would start to skip against each other, and the amount of resistance in that skipping is less than when they fully fit together. That is why we need to numbers. We need one for when things are fully fit together and move as one, and one for when they start to slip and skip against each other.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top