Maxwell - Boltzmann Distribution Integral: Proving Its Normalization

  • Thread starter Thread starter mopar969
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boltzmann Maxwell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the normalization of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution integral, specifically that the integral of the function f(v) from zero to infinity equals one. Participants emphasize the need to compute the integral algebraically to demonstrate this property. A resource was shared that explains how to integrate functions of the form exp(-av²), which is relevant for solving the integral. After performing the integration, a complex expression was derived, and the next step is to simplify this expression to show it equals one. The conversation highlights the challenge of integrating the function and the importance of understanding the underlying mathematics.
mopar969
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Show that the Maxwell - Boltzmann distribution integral: the integral of f(v) dv from zero to infinity is equal to one.

I know what the formula is but I am unsure on how to approach this problem. Please help in any way. Thanks.

Also, I know that the integral is the area under the curve of a function so the are must be 1 but how do I show this algebraically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to actually compute the integral. You have to integrate the function f(v) from 0 to ∞. The answer you get should be 1.
 
Is there an easy way to integrate it because it is not an easy function?
 
I found this page that might be of assistance:

http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node87.html

First it tells you how to integrate a function of the form exp(-av²), where a is some constant. Then, the last two lines at the bottom show you how to use that result to determine the integral of a function of the form v²exp(-av²).
 
Okay thanks for the site. I solved the integral and got 4pi((m/(2pikt))^(3/2))[(2kt)/(4m)][square root of((2pikt)/(m))]. But now how do I show that this equals one? Please help.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top