Maxwell Equations in Tensor notation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the reduction of the equation involving the Levi-Civita symbol and the partial derivatives of the electromagnetic field tensor, F. The transformation is clarified by noting that the antisymmetry of F allows for simplifications, leading to a scalar equation when the fourth index, delta, is set to zero. The participants address confusion regarding the role of delta, confirming it refers to the fourth index in the epsilon tensor. It is emphasized that the original equation can represent multiple equations depending on the value assigned to delta. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding tensor notation in the context of Maxwell's equations.
Karliski
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formul...s_in_special_relativity#Maxwell.27s_equations

Why does
0 = \epsilon^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} \frac{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}}{\partial x^\gamma}<br />
reduce to
<br /> 0 = {\partial F_{\alpha\beta}\over\partial x^\gamma} + {\partial F_{\beta\gamma}\over\partial x^\alpha} + {\partial F_{\gamma\alpha}\over\partial x^\beta}<br />
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<br /> 0<br /> = \epsilon^{\alpha \beta \gamma 0} \frac{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}}{\partial x^\gamma}<br /> = {\partial F_{\alpha\beta}\over\partial x^\gamma} + {\partial F_{\beta\gamma}\over\partial x^\alpha} + {\partial F_{\gamma\alpha}\over\partial x^\beta} - {\partial F_{\beta\alpha}\over\partial x^\gamma} - {\partial F_{\gamma\beta}\over\partial x^\alpha} - {\partial F_{\alpha\gamma}\over\partial x^\beta}<br /> = 2 \left( {\partial F_{\alpha\beta}\over\partial x^\gamma} + {\partial F_{\beta\gamma}\over\partial x^\alpha} + {\partial F_{\gamma\alpha}\over\partial x^\beta} \right)<br />
because F_{\alpha\beta}[/itex] is antisymmetric.
 
Why was delta set to 0?
 
What "delta" are you talking about? There was no "delta" in your original question nor in Adriank's response.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What "delta" are you talking about? There was no "delta" in your original question nor in Adriank's response.

Actually, delta is the fourth index on the anti-symmetric epsilon tensor in both Karliski's post and in the wikipedia equation he linked to. It is basically an error, we should have delta = 0 as in adriank's post, but if delta is not zero then we just get four copies of the same equation.
 
The "equation" in #1 is actually four equations, one for each value of \delta. The one with \delta=0 is the scalar equation

\nabla\cdot\vec B=0

The one with \delta=i\neq 0 is the ith component of the vector equation

\nabla\times\vec E+\frac{\partial\vec B}{\partial t}=0

(Edit: ...except for a factor of two).
 
Last edited:
The equation
0 = \epsilon^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} \frac{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}}{\partial x^\gamma}
is written with a \delta only on one side, which means we can "plug in" any specific value for it. So I put \delta = 0 and explicitly wrote out the sum \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma0}F_{\alpha\beta,\gamma}.
 
Back
Top