Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Maxwell Lagrangian at weak fields

  1. Dec 6, 2014 #1
    In http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9506035 the author said after writing this equation:

    $$\frac{1}{4}\eta^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho} F_{\mu\nu}F_{\lambda\rho} = \eta_{\sigma\tau\alpha\beta}\frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\sigma\tau}} \frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\alpha\beta} } + 2C$$

    where C was arbitrary constant of integration." In fact, if L is to agree with the usual Maxwell Lagrangian at weak fields the constant must vanish". Why? I mean why should the constant vanish. It seems that I don't understand what he meant by Maxwell Lagrangian at "weak fields".
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 6, 2014 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Imagine the case of no field at all. Everything apart from the constant is zero, so the constant has to be zero as well.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Maxwell Lagrangian at weak fields
  1. EM field lagrangian (Replies: 5)

Loading...