Maxwell Stress Tensor -> Force between magnets and perfect iron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force between a magnet and a perfect iron structure using the Maxwell Stress Tensor (MST) through an airgap. The user initially struggles with applying the MST correctly, particularly in relation to the divergence theorem and the linear properties of the materials involved. They clarify that the iron has ideal linear magnetic properties, and the permanent magnet follows a linear loading curve. A key realization is that the divergence theorem was misapplied, leading to incorrect results compared to finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. Ultimately, the correct application of the MST involves using the surface integral of the stress tensor rather than the divergence.
SunnyBoyNY
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
(this is not a hw)

Assume you have a magnet of dimensions x_m, h_m, remanent flux density Br, and coercive field density Hc. The magnet is placed in a magnetic "C" structure (perfect iron) such that it is connected on one side but there is an airgap on the other side.

xxxxxxxx
xx... xx
xx...gg
xx...mm
xx...mm
xxxxxxxx

Stack length is 1 m for simplicity.

I know how to calculate gap flux density as a function of airgap length. I am struggling, however, with using the Maxwell Stress tensor to calculate the force between the magnet and the structure through the airgap.

This is what I tried:

<br /> Bm = Br / (1+Br*g(h_m*u0*Hc))<br />

<br /> \nabla\cdot\sigma_{xyz}= \frac{1}{\mu_{0}} \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \frac{\partial 0.5B_{x}^{2}}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial B_{x}B_{y}}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial B_{x}B_{z}}{\partial x}\\ <br /> <br /> \frac{\partial B_{y}B_{x}}{\partial y} &amp; \frac{\partial 0.5B_{y}^{2}}{\partial y} &amp; \frac{\partial B_{y}B_{z}}{\partial y}\\<br /> <br /> \frac{\partial B_{z}B_{x}}{\partial z} &amp; \frac{\partial B_{z}B_{y}}{\partial z}&amp; \frac{\partial 0.5B_{z}^{2}}{\partial z} \\ <br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> <br />

care only about one direction, which simplifies the equation to 1/2u0 * dBm^2/dx.

Now integrate over volume:

<br /> F = \int_{V} \mathbf{f} \mathrm{d} V = \int_{V} (\nabla\cdot\sigma)\mathrm{d} V = \oint_{S} (\mathbf{f}\cdot\mathbf{n})\mathrm{d} A <br />

But the numbers consistently come out wrong - with respect to a FEA simulation. Do I use the MST incorrectly?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivation of the MST requires a linear material (constant mu). Therefor, the MST cannot be applied to ferromagnets.
 
Meir Achuz said:
The derivation of the MST requires a linear material (constant mu). Therefor, the MST cannot be applied to ferromagnets.

Thank you. I forgot to mention that the iron has ideal (linear) magnetic properties such that:

<br /> B_{iron} = \mu_{r} \cdot \mu_{0} \cdot H_{iron}<br />

Also, the permanent magnet has a linear loading curve:

<br /> B_{mag} = B_{R} \cdot (1-H_{mag}/H_{c})<br />
 
Found the problem: I used the divergence theorem incorrectly.

Volume integral of field divergence is equal to the closed surface integral of the field itself, not its divergence.

<br /> F = \int_{V} \mathbf{f} \mathrm{d} V = \int_{V} (\nabla\cdot\sigma)\mathrm{d} V = \oint_{S} (\sigma\cdot\mathbf{n})\mathrm{d} A = \oint_{S} \sigma \cdot\mathrm{d} \vec{A}<br />
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top