I Maxwell Tensor Identity Explained: Deriving Formula 8.23 in Schawrtz's Book

dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
Hello,

In Schawrtz, Page 116, formula 8.23, he seems to suggest that the square of the Maxwell tensor can be expanded out as follows:

$$-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu \nu}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}A_{\mu}\square A_{\mu}-\frac{1}{2}A_{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\nu}$$

where:

$$F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$$

For the life of me, I can't seem to derive this. I get close, but always with an extra unwanted term, or two.

Anyone have a hint on the best way to proceed?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
... keeping it under the integral (of S) and differentiating by parts works out here. However, is there a way to achieve this with just tensor manipulation? I thought so, but I may not be remembering correctly.
 
dm4b said:
However, is there a way to achieve this with just tensor manipulation?

No, you need to integrate by parts. The equality sign there is a bit misleading.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
The equality is modulo a total derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top