Maxwells Equations and Time Invariance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conditions under which Maxwell's equations can be solved using harmonic time dependence, specifically the form E(r, t) = E(r)exp(jωt). Participants clarify that while the dielectric function ε can be considered time invariant under certain conditions, it is inherently frequency-dependent, which introduces complexities like loss tangents in dielectrics. The conversation highlights that ε may vary due to slow external perturbations or strong fields, leading to nonlinear optical effects. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that energy conservation principles underpin the use of harmonic solutions in this context. The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in optics compared to RF microwave transmission.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

In my book it says that if the dielectric function ε is time invariant, we can write a solution to Maxwells equations of the form E(r, t) = E(r)exp(jωt). I agree that the ME are separable, but I don't see how they know that the time-dependence is harmonic? What is so special about exp(jωt) in this respect?Niles.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think I understand it actually.. I just had to refresh my QM. Thanks.
 
Niles said:
Hi

In my book it says that if the dielectric function ε is time invariant, we can write a solution to Maxwells equations of the form E(r, t) = E(r)exp(jωt). I agree that the ME are separable, but I don't see how they know that the time-dependence is harmonic? What is so special about exp(jωt) in this respect?Niles.

\epsilon\; is not time invariant in the sense because it is frequency dependent which means there is a \frac{dV}{dt}\; dependent. There is no pure lossless dielectric, there is always a loss tangent for all dielectrics.

\vec E_{(\vec r,t)}=Re[\tilde E_{(\vec r)}e^{j\omega t}] \;\hbox { not }\;\vec E_{(\vec r,t)}=\tilde E_{(\vec r)}e^{j\omega t}

And The phasor \tilde E_{\vec r}\; do have the attenuation constant that has frequency dependent part. The question on your statement is whether frequency depend implies time dependent.
 
Last edited:
yungman said:
\epsilon\; is not time invariant in the sense because it is frequency dependent which means there is a \frac{dV}{dt}\; dependent. There is no pure lossless dielectric, there is always a loss tangent for all dielectrics.

Well, there is two things here:

1) ε might vary because of some external perturbation, but that will generally be very slow compared to optical frequencies, so in this sense can say that it is time invariant, so it is quasi stationary

2) ε might be influenced by the field itself assuming the field is strong enough -> nonlinear optics

I guess (1) is relevant for our discussion. That ε = ε(ω) means we have dispersion. Only if ε is complex do we have absorption.
 
Niles said:
Well, there is two things here:

1) ε might vary because of some external perturbation, but that will generally be very slow compared to optical frequencies, so in this sense can say that it is time invariant, so it is quasi stationary

2) ε might be influenced by the field itself assuming the field is strong enough -> nonlinear optics

I guess (1) is relevant for our discussion. That ε = ε(ω) means we have dispersion. Only if ε is complex do we have absorption.

I am going to stop here, I don't know optics, I based on RF microwave tx line which is still EM, but the environment is completely different and I am not qualified to talk on this. Sorry.
 
No need to apologize. Thanks for helping. By the way, the answer to my original question was (in principle) energy conservation.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top