Maxwell's equations differential forms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the formulation of Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime using differential forms. The equations are expressed as dF = 0 for homogeneous cases and d*F = 4π*j for inhomogeneous cases, where F represents the electromagnetic field strength tensor and * denotes the Hodge dual. The participant successfully simplifies the calculations by employing a metric-compatible derivative operator and demonstrates the relationship between the exterior derivative of the Hodge dual and the four-current density. The final conclusion confirms that (d*F) = 4π*j, establishing the equivalence of the differential form representation of Maxwell's equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their properties
  • Familiarity with Hodge duality in the context of differential geometry
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's equations in both differential and integral forms
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and the manipulation of indices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of differential forms in general relativity
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Hodge dual in various dimensions
  • Explore advanced topics in tensor calculus, focusing on index manipulation techniques
  • Investigate the implications of Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime and their physical interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students specializing in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, general relativity, and differential geometry.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552

Homework Statement


I have to take the curved space - time homogenous and inhomogeneous maxwell equations, \triangledown ^{a}F_{ab} = -4\pi j_{b} and \triangledown _{[a}F_{bc]} = 0, and show they can be put in terms of differential forms as dF = 0 and d*F = 4\pi *j (here * is the hodge dual defined for any p - form \alpha as (*\alpha )_{b_1...b_{n-p}} = \frac{1}{p!}\alpha ^{a_1...a_p}\epsilon _{a_1...a_pb_1...b_{n-p}} where n is the dimension of the manifold and \epsilon is the natural volume element for the manifold i.e. a totally anti - symmetric nowhere vanishing continuous tensor field).

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the exterior derivative d is independent of the choice of derivative operator, I chose for convenience the unique metric compatible derivative operator \triangledown _{a} because \triangledown _{c}\epsilon _{a_1...a_p} = 0 identically and this simplifies the calculation. The homogenous ones are trivial since (dF)_{ba_1a_2} = 3\triangledown_{[b}F_{a_1a_2]} = 0. The inhomogeneous ones are really starting to annoy me :frown:. This is 4 dimensional space - time so we have that *F_{b_1b_2} = \frac{1}{2}F^{a_1a_2}\epsilon _{a_1a_2b_1b_2} hence (d*F)_{cb_1b_2} = 3\triangledown _{[c}*F_{b_1b_2]} = \triangledown _{c}*F_{b_1b_2} - \triangledown _{b_1}*F_{cb_2} + \triangledown _{b_2}*F_{cb_1} (where I have assumed the anti - symmetry of the hodge dual of the EM field strength tensor to combine terms). Plugging in the equation for the hodge dual gives us (d*F)_{cb_1b_2} = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon _{a_1a_2b_1b_2}\triangledown _{c}F^{a_1a_2} - \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_2}\triangledown _{b_1}F^{a_1a_2} + \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_1}\triangledown _{b_2}F^{a_1a_2}). On the other hand, 4\pi (*j)_{b_1b_2b_3} = 4\pi j^{a_1}\epsilon _{a_1b_1b_2b_3} = \triangledown _{r}F^{a_1r}\epsilon _{a_1b_1b_2b_3}. Has my work been correct so far? This is where I'm stuck because the two different equations (the one for the hodge dual of the 4 - current density and the one for the exterior derivative of the hodge dual of the EM tensor) are being summed over totally different indices, as you can see, so I cannot begin to even see how to resolve the two so they can be equal.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah ok I got it. It was the form of the final pair of equations written above that threw me off with their unsettling nature and the stagnation stemmed from the equation we started with. In fact, if we had instead started with *(d*F) = -4\pi j, instead of what the book asked to start with, then the solution would have been much more obvious and saved me some tine :). Anyways, we take (d*F)_{cb_1b_2} = (\epsilon _{a_1a_2b_1b_2}\triangledown _{c}F^{a_1a_2} - \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_2}\triangledown _{b_1}F^{a_1a_2} + \epsilon _{a_1a_2cb_1}\triangledown _{b_2}F^{a_1a_2}) and multiply both sides by \epsilon ^{b_1b_2b_3c} to get \epsilon ^{b_1b_2b_3c}(d*F)_{b_1b_2b_3} = (\delta ^{[b_3 c]}_{a_1a_2}\triangledown _{b_3}F^{a_1a_2} - \delta ^{[b_2 c]}_{a_1a_2}\triangledown _{b_2}F^{a_1a_2} + \delta ^{[b_1 c]}_{a_1a_2}\triangledown _{b_1}F^{a_1a_2}) = \triangledown _{b_3}F^{b_3c} - \triangledown _{b_2}F^{b_2c} + \triangledown _{b_1}F^{b_1c} = \triangledown _{b_1}F^{b_1c} = -4\pi j^{c} therefore \epsilon _{b_1b_2b_3c}(d*F)^{b_1b_2b_3} = *(d*F)_c = -4\pi j_{c} so **(d*F)_{a_1a_2a_3} = (-1)^{1 + 2(4 - 2)}(d*F)_{a_1a_2a_3} = -(d*F)_{a_1a_2a_3} = -4\pi *j_{a_1a_2a_3} thus (d*F)= 4\pi *j
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K