- #1
art pletcher
- 6
- 0
May a layman post a scientific manuscript (regarding cosmology) in "arXiv"? Will it be properly reviewed? Thank you, if you know the answer.
No. arXiv does not review articles. That is one reason that sources on arXiv are often not considered valid sources here at PF.art pletcher said:Will it be properly reviewed?
art pletcher said:May a layman post a scientific manuscript (regarding cosmology) in "arXiv"?
Orodruin said:if you are not a member of a trusted academic institution, you may need endorsement from a person in the field.
DaleSpam said:No. arXiv does not review articles. That is one reason that sources on arXiv are often not considered valid sources here at PF.
StatGuy2000 said:My understanding is the arXiv does not review articles, per se, but functions more as a pre-print service so that those technical reports that are pre-publication can see the light of day. Many researchers in various fields (e.g math, physics, statistics, theoretical computer science, etc.) often post their articles in arXiv in this manner. Would these technical reports not be considered valid sources, if they are intended to be submitted for peer review?
The rules require that topics must "be found in textbooks or that have been published in reputable journals." If an arXiv source is consistent with textbooks or reputable journals then it is fine, but "intended to be submitted for peer review" is not in itself a sufficient qualification for something that is outside the mainstream.StatGuy2000 said:Would these technical reports not be considered valid sources, if they are intended to be submitted for peer review?
StatGuy2000 said:My understanding is the arXiv does not review articles, per se, but functions more as a pre-print service so that those technical reports that are pre-publication can see the light of day. Many researchers in various fields (e.g math, physics, statistics, theoretical computer science, etc.) often post their articles in arXiv in this manner. Would these technical reports not be considered valid sources, if they are intended to be submitted for peer review?
Vanadium 50 said:Also, I don't think it is the job of endorsers to read random manuscripts from people they don't know. It's the job of endorsers to say things like "This paper is from my student, and that's why she hasn't submitted before."
In many (most?) cases, this will not be necessary as the student will be a member of a trusted institute. I thought I would have to endorse my student when he submitted his first paper, but no. He had no problems.Vanadium 50 said:Also, I don't think it is the job of endorsers to read random manuscripts from people they don't know. It's the job of endorsers to say things like "This paper is from my student, and that's why she hasn't submitted before."
Vanadium 50 said:But we're drifting. Do you think it's the responsbility of endorsers to review works by people unknown to him that do not have greenlighted institutional affilaitions? I don't. I get a few every year, and I send them straight to the trash. Partly because I am an experimeter and these are always theories.
No. As per our Global Guidelines which can be found in the INFO menu at the top right of any page here, under "Terms and Rules", we do not discuss research that has not already appeared in professional circles, generally via publication in a peer-reviewed journal, although there can be exceptions for arXiv. Nor do we provide pre-publication review. For further explanation of our history in this area, see here:jumpjack said:Does it exist in this forum an "arXiv endorsers" section? Where unaffiliated people could post previews of their jobs and get rated by scientist who read the forum.
jumpjack said:Does it exist in this forum an "arXiv endorsers" section? Where unaffiliated people could post previews of their jobs and get rated by scientist who read the forum.
People getting interest and attention could deserve an endorsement on arXiv.
Example: I am not a seismologist, but 7 years ago I performed some calculations to debunk/confirm a theory about L'Aquila earthquake strength, declared by media as stronger than previous earthquakes, although this was rated 5.8 and the others 6.4-6.9.
<<link deleted to conform with PF policy about unpublished research>>
I think it would have been interesting to publish a short paper on this topic, just to explain the job performed, but didn't know where to start from.
Today I finished a totally different study, about Atmospheric Physics.
<<link deleted to conform with PF policy about unpublished research>>
I'm not affiliated to any institution, I'm just an engineer loving calculations and physics :-)
How could I publish my works in places more interesting than a blog, so they can be visited and evaluated by real scientists?
You are right. On the other hand, as far as I know, Perelman published his proofs on the ArXiv only.micromass said:ublishing on ArXiv really isn't an accomplishment. It's a PRE-print server. What you need to do is to publish in an actual journal, not ArXiv. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you only posted on ArXiv.
Krylov said:You are right. On the other hand, as far as I know, Perelman published his proofs on the ArXiv only.
micromass said:Yeah, but the difference is that if people who are already "known" in the field post something on ArXiv, then it will be read. That is the entire point of ArXiv, so "known" professors can communicate easier with each other. If somebody totally unkown posts on ArXiv, then nobody will care.
Yes, arXiv is open to anyone who wants to share their scientific research and findings, regardless of their background or expertise. As long as the manuscript meets the arXiv submission requirements and it is related to one of the subject areas covered by arXiv, it can be posted by a layman.
arXiv covers a wide range of scientific disciplines, including physics, mathematics, computer science, and biology. However, there are certain topics that are not accepted, such as personal opinions, political or religious discussions, and non-scientific content.
No, arXiv does not require authors to have a degree or be affiliated with an institution. As long as the manuscript is of high quality and meets the submission requirements, it can be posted by anyone, including laymen.
No, arXiv is a non-profit platform and does not charge any fees for submitting or accessing manuscripts. However, it relies on donations to cover its operational costs, so authors are encouraged to make a voluntary contribution if they are able to.
No, arXiv is a preprint server, and it does not have a formal peer-review process. However, manuscripts are moderated by a team of moderators who ensure that they meet the submission requirements and are relevant to the subject areas covered by arXiv. Authors are also encouraged to seek feedback and suggestions from the community through comments and discussions on their posted manuscripts.