ME statics shear/moment diagrams through integration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of shear and moment diagrams through integration, specifically addressing the integration of a distributed load function w = (2/3)x. There is confusion regarding the application of the shear force equation and the inclusion of an 18 kN force in the equilibrium equations. Participants clarify that the distributed load should not be mixed with point loads, emphasizing that the correct shear force equation is derived from the loading function. The conversation highlights the importance of maintaining consistent units and understanding the relationship between shear force and distributed loading. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on the correct application of these principles in solving the problem.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Untitled.png


Homework Equations


w=(2/3)x

The Attempt at a Solution


So integrating w to get V

(1/3)x^2 +C

Then Sum in the Y-direction should be
9-(2/3)x+18=0

Somebody tell me what in god's name is going on here. It seems like they are ignoring the 18kN force and then plugging in my shear in the sum of Y-forces... What?!

This totally contradicts the formula dV/dx = -w

That would simply give me V=(1/3)x^2 + C
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if you would post the complete problem statement, as the rules of PF ask you to do.
 
The equation for ΣFy = 9 - (1/3)x2 - V = 0, applies to the free body diagram depicted in Fig. (b). V and M are the shear force and bending moment which keep this FB in equilibrium under the applied load and the reaction at the LH end of the beam. The right hand reaction of 18 kN is not involved in maintaining this equilibrium, except when dealing with the loaded beam as a whole.

Feodalherren said:
Then Sum in the Y-direction should be
9-(2/3)x+18=0

This is an incorrect statement. The loading of the beam, w = (2/3) x kN/m, is clearly expressing the magnitude of the distributed loading as a function of position along the beam, not the total applied load between 0 and x. Your statement is mixing the two reactions, which are both measured in kN, with a distributed loading, which is measured in kN/m, and thus has no meaning.
 
  • Like
Likes Feodalherren
But what about the fact that dV/dx = -w

That would mean that V= (1/3)x^2
??
 
Feodalherren said:
But what about the fact that dV/dx = -w

That would mean that V= (1/3)x^2
??

According to the OP, V = 9 - (1/3)x^2. What's dV/dx in this case? How does it compare to w = (2/3)x as shown in Fig. (b) of the OP?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Back
Top