Mean elongation of spring with temperature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mean elongation of a spring under the influence of temperature, using the spring constant and gravitational acceleration. The initial energy expression is debated, with corrections suggested regarding the potential energy formulation. The integration for the partition function leads to complications, particularly with the integral diverging to infinity. Suggestions include using "completing the square" for the quadratic energy expression and addressing the symmetry in the integrals to find the mean and variance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the energy terms and evaluating the integrals for accurate results.
jorgen
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have to determine the mean elongation of a spring with temperature. The spring constant is alpha and the gravitational acceleration is g. I have the following expression for the force

F = -\alpha*x +m*g

which I can integrate for an expression of the energy

E = \frac{-\alpha*x^2}{2}+m*g*x

I can factorize this into

E = (x-\frac{m*g}{\alpha})^2

than I would like to put it into the Boltzman distribution getting the partition function and from that determine the mean elongation

Z = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}exp(-E*\beta)

but this gives me infinity - any help or advice appreciated thanks in advance,

Best
J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jorgen said:
Hi all,

I have to determine the mean elongation of a spring with temperature. The spring constant is alpha and the gravitational acceleration is g. I have the following expression for the force

F = -\alpha*x +m*g

which I can integrate for an expression of the energy

E = \frac{-\alpha*x^2}{2}+m*g*x

I can factorize this into

E = (x-\frac{m*g}{\alpha})^2
I don't think so. If you expand that expression, you get something different than
E = \frac{-\alpha*x^2}{2}+m*g*x
which you had before.

Also, the potential energy of the spring should be +½αx2

Also, are you defining a positive displacement as upward or downward?

than I would like to put it into the Boltzman distribution getting the partition function and from that determine the mean elongation

Z = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}exp(-E*\beta)

but this gives me infinity - any help or advice appreciated thanks in advance,

Best
J
 
hi,

I am defining the displacement from -infinity to +infinity where the Boltzmann weights should be very small for none probable elongations.

The potential energy is

E = alpha*x^2/2 + m*g*x

I need some hints on how to factorize the energy. Thanks in advance
 
I think I see where you need to go with this.

Are you familiar with "completing the square" for quadratic expressions? That would be a good way to manipulate your energy expression, and get the integral in terms of something you can evaluate.

BTW, is your integral expression missing a "dx" term?
 
Hi again,

I write the potential energy as (x-m*g/alpha)^2 and then substract the constant which is just a constant so it is not so important - I guess? - then I write it as a Boltzmann

mean(x) = \frac{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x*exp(-\beta*(x-m*g/alpha)^2}{ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}exp(-\beta*(x-m*g/alpha)^2)}

which due to the symmetry gives zeros - does this seem reasonable and any hints how to proceed to find the variance?

Any hints appreciated thanks in advance

Best
J
 
jorgen said:
Hi again,

I write the potential energy as (x-m*g/alpha)^2 and then substract the constant which is just a constant so it is not so important - I guess?
Ah, you're right, the constant is not important and would cancel out later anyway.
That being said, how would you feel about

(alpha/2) (x + m g / alpha)2

for the potential energy? If you're in doubt, try expanding that expression, also expand what you had, and compare them with

alpha x2/2 + mgx​

... - then I write it as a Boltzmann

mean(x) = \frac{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x*exp(-\beta*(x-m*g/alpha)^2}{ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}exp(-\beta*(x-m*g/alpha)^2)}

which due to the symmetry gives zeros - does this seem reasonable
Actually, the integral in the numerator is not zero.

and any hints how to proceed to find the variance?

I'd look at the definition of variance, and evaluate the integrals involved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top