Mean energy behavior as a function of T.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Here's a problem the TA made but now that I look back at it, I wonder how he did it.

A system contains N weakly interacting particles, each of which can be in either one of two states of respective energies \epsilon_1 and \epsilon_2 with \epsilon_1<\epsilon_2.

a) With no explicit computation, draw a qualitative representation of the mean energy \bar{E} of the system as a function of the temperature T. What happens to \bar{E} in the limit of very small and very large temparatures? Approximately at which value of T does \bar{E} changes from its low temperature limit to its high temperature limit?


He drew a curve that starts at T=0 with \bar{E}(0)=N\epsilon_1, rises up, appears to have an inflexion point at (\epsilon_2-\epsilon_1)/k, and approaches N(\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2)/2 as T\rightarrow +\infty.

I just really don't know how he knows all that. The only relation btw T and E I know is really not helpful:

\frac{1}{kT}=\frac{\partial \ln(\Omega)}{\partial E}

There's one in term of the partition function too but we're not allowed to calculate it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top