Measurement of Lx: Result of Measurement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physgeek64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring the operator L_x for a given wave function ψ = zf(r). The participants note that L_x can be expressed using the ladder operators L_+ and L_-, and they derive that L_x |ψ> results in a state proportional to |1,1>. However, they express uncertainty about determining the actual measurement outcome, emphasizing the need for eigenvalue equations. It is suggested that to find the expected value of L_x, one must use its differential form and integrate the wave function appropriately. Ultimately, while the expected value may be zero, the outcome of an individual measurement could differ and requires proper integration of the wave function with the operator.
Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


If we have a wave function ##\psi =zf(r)## and we take a measurement of ##L_x## what is the result of the measurement?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So i know we can write ##L_x=\frac{1}{2}(L_+ + L_- )## and that ##|\psi > = g(r) |1,0> ## so ##L_x |\psi >= \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{2} g(r) |1,1>##. But i don't know what the measurement would be because this has to be an eigenvalue equation to read off the result of a measurement (I think?).

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physgeek64 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So i know we can write Lx=12(L++L−)Lx=12(L++L−)L_x=\frac{1}{2}(L_+ + L_- ) and that |ψ>=g(r)|1,0>|ψ>=g(r)|1,0>|\psi > = g(r) |1,0> so Lx|ψ>=12√2g(r)|1,1>Lx|ψ>=122g(r)|1,1>L_x |\psi >= \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{2} g(r) |1,1>. But i don't know what the measurement would be because this has to be an eigenvalue equation to read off the result of a measurement (I think?).

Many thanks!

you have a given wave function which is a function of r and theta only
if you wish to find expected value of L(x) then one must use differential form of the operator L(x)
 
drvrm said:
you have a given wave function which is a function of r and theta only
if you wish to find expected value of L(x) then one must use differential form of the operator L(x)
But how do i find the result of a measurement. I can show that the expected value is zero, but i don't know what the outcome of an individual measurement would be.
 
Physgeek64 said:
But how do i find the result of a measurement. I can show that the expected value is zero, but i don't know what the outcome of an individual measurement would be.

In QM the measurement is defined with the help of wave function
say you have a position wavefunction then you can measure x-operator

as {Psi * (x )Psi }integrated over the whole space.
similarly L(x) is a operator which is represented in (r,theta, phi) space .

put the complex conjugate of the wave function on the left and psi on the right and L(x) in between and integrate over whole space .
the result will give you measurement and it may not be zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top