Measuring Energy and Linear Momentum Consecutively

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Can the total energy and linear momentum of a particle moving in one dimension in a constant potential field be measured consecutively with no uncertainty in the values obtained?

Solution
Yes, this is possible. The energy and linear momentum operators are, respectively

\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + V

\hat{p} = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

Now, note that these two operators commute. Because of this, they share the same eigenstates. Now, once the total energy or linear momentum is measured, the wavefunction of the state collapses into an eigenstate of the measured observable. Now, this eigenstate is also an eigenstate of the observable which hasn't been measured yet. Therefore, we can precisely measure this unmeasured observable as well. \blacksquare

Are my arguments correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can also directly tell from the fact that the energy in a constant potential field is a function of momentum only. If you've measured momentum, you know the energy too. And yes, your argument is correct.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top