Measuring Projectile Velocity Using Block Deviation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gavroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block deviation
AI Thread Summary
To measure the velocity of a projectile using block deviation, the problem involves a block suspended on ropes that is struck by the projectile. The conservation of momentum applies during the collision phase, allowing for the calculation of the block's final velocity, which then serves as the initial velocity for the subsequent swing phase. In the swing phase, mechanical energy conservation can be used to analyze the motion further. It's important to account for the mass of both the projectile and the block, as well as the length of the ropes. This approach effectively combines principles of momentum and energy conservation to determine the projectile's velocity.
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
First of all: Sorry about my English, but I am from France ;-)
The problem:
Somebody shoots into a block which is put up on two free running ropes and now you want to determine the velocity of the projectile by measuring the deviation of the block. I also have to consider gravity, which may protect the block from being deviated and the projectile gets stuck to the block, if this is important.
I want to add that the mass of the projectile, the mass of the block and the length of the ropes are known.
I am sorry that I can’t offer you an initial stage for a solution. The only thing I know is that the conservation of momentum may be a possible approach
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Gavroy! Welcome to PF! :smile:

In questions like this, divide the motion into two stages, the collision and the swing …

i] in the collision, momentum is conserved, so find the final velocity for the collision, wchi becomes the initial velocity for the swing

ii] in the swing, (mechanical) energy is conserved :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top